Paper · 1992 · jpa

Management for Large Seed Size in Spring Wheat

J. Moes; E. H. Stobbe; M. H. Entz

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Large wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) seed exhibits advantages over small seed in seedling growth and yield potential, but in seed processing, rigorous screening for large size may lead to unacceptably high screening losses. Studies were conducted to determine the effects of seeding rate (SR), N management, and foliar fungicide (FF) application on seed yield (yield of seeds above 0.094‐in. sieve size) and cleanout (percentage of seeds below 0.094‐in. sieve size), on the hypothesis that seed crop management could be altered to ensure a high proportion of large seed in a seed lot. ‘Katepwa’ wheat was seeded in 1988 and 1989 at Portage la Prairie, MB, at 18 and 36 viable seeds/sq ft, with additional N applied at seeding or broadcast at stem elongation, and FF applied at heading. In a second study, Katepwa and ‘Roblin’ wheat were seeded at Portage and at Carman, MB, in 1990, and on two seeding dates at Portage in 1991, at 9, 18, 27, and 36 viable seeds/sq ft. Generally, for Katepwa, seed yield was optimum and cleanout was minimum at a SR of 18 seeds/sq ft, although a SR of 27 seeds/sq ft appeared to be beneficial if conditions were dry during grain filling. The cultivar (C) × SR interaction was not significant, yet it appeared that Roblin required a SR of at least 27 seeds/sq ft for optimum seed yield. Additional N (beyond requirement, according to soil test reCommendations) at seeding or at stem elongation were not effective in improving seed yield or reducing cleanout losses. Foliar fungicide application resulted in statistically significant increases in seed yield and decreases in cleanout. Seed grower attention to SR and foliar disease control offer potential methods of ensuring the production of seed lots with a high proportion of large seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Katepwa seed yield was optimal at 18 seeds per square foot.

Material
Katepwae0
Treatment
SR of 18 seeds/sq fte0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for Katepwa, seed yield was optimum and cleanout was minimum at a SR of 18 seeds/sq ft”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Katepwa cleanout was minimal at 18 seeds per square foot.

Material
Katepwae0
Treatment
SR of 18 seeds/sq fte0
Outcome
cleanoute0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for Katepwa, seed yield was optimum and cleanout was minimum at a SR of 18 seeds/sq ft”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 27 seeds per square foot appeared beneficial under dry grain filling.

Treatment
SR of 27 seeds/sq fte0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
if conditions were dry during grain fillinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a SR of 27 seeds/sq ft appeared to be beneficial if conditions were dry during grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by seeding rate interaction was not significant.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
cultivar (C) × SR interactione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar (C) × SR interaction was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Roblin appeared to require at least 27 seeds per square foot for optimal seed yield.

Material
Robline0
Outcome
SR of at least 27 seeds/sq fte0
Value
27 seeds/sq fte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roblin required a SR of at least 27 seeds/sq ft for optimum seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra nitrogen at seeding or stem elongation did not improve seed yield.

Treatment
Additional Ne0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
not effectivee0
Comparator
beyond requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N (beyond requirement, according to soil test reCommendations) at seeding or at stem elongation were not effective in improving seed yield or reducing cleanout losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra nitrogen did not reduce cleanout losses.

Treatment
Additional Ne0
Outcome
cleanout lossese0
Direction
not effectivee0
Comparator
beyond requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N (beyond requirement, according to soil test reCommendations) at seeding or at stem elongation were not effective in improving seed yield or reducing cleanout losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicide significantly increased seed yield.

Treatment
Foliar fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fungicide application resulted in statistically significant increases in seed yield and decreases in cleanout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fungicide significantly decreased cleanout.

Treatment
Foliar fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
cleanoute0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fungicide application resulted in statistically significant increases in seed yield and decreases in cleanout”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers should attend to seeding rate and foliar disease control to produce large seed lots.

Treatment
SR and foliar disease controle0
Outcome
production of seed lots with a high proportion of large seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed grower attention to SR and foliar disease control offer potential methods of ensuring the production of seed lots with a high proportion of large seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.