Paper · 1993 · Journal of Horticultural Science

Studies on the induction of flowering in juvenilePrunus aviumL.

Cristina M. Oliveira; G. Browning

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractJuvenile Prunus avium shoot apices produced flowering shoots after grafting to mature trees irrespective of treatment of the apices in the season before grafting with G A or G A + cytokinin. Scions grown from mature shoot apices grafted to seedling stocks failed to flower, again irrespective of prior hormone treatment. Similar treatment of mature shoot apices with these hormones, or with zeatin, inhibited concurrent floral initiation, but G A or GA + zeatin treatments increased flowering of scions grown from the treated apices after grafting to untreated mature trees. Localized shoot tip or root drench treatment of one or two year old seedlings with (2RS, 3RS)-paclobutrazol failed to induce flowering, but treatment of three or four year old plants did stimulate flowering. Branch or stem girdling or root flooding applied alone or in combination to three year old plants did not affect flowering. Floral initiation by three or four year old plants was inhibited by treatment with GAs. The results were consistent with the presence in seedlings of a root- produced, xylem transported, graft-transmissible inhibitor(s), which control the initiation of otherwise competent meristems, and which could include factors other than GAs. Juvenile meristem competence to flower was not affected by prior GA treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Juvenile shoot apices flowered after grafting to mature trees regardless of prior GA or cytokinin.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviume0
Organ / stage
Juvenile Prunus avium shoot apicese0
Treatment
grafting to mature treese0
Outcome
flowering shootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Juvenile Prunus avium shoot apices produced flowering shoots after grafting to mature trees irrespective of treatment of the apices in the season before grafting with G A or G A + cytokinin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature shoot apex scions on seedling stocks failed to flower regardless of prior hormone treatment.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
mature shoot apicese0
Treatment
grafted to seedling stockse0
Outcome
failed to flowere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Scions grown from mature shoot apices grafted to seedling stocks failed to flower, again irrespective of prior hormone treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA, GA plus cytokinin, or zeatin inhibited concurrent floral initiation in mature apices.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
mature shoot apicese0
Treatment
zeatine0
Outcome
floral initiatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar treatment of mature shoot apices with these hormones, or with zeatin, inhibited concurrent floral initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA or GA plus zeatin increased later flowering after grafting treated apices to mature trees.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
G A or GA + zeatin treatmentse0
Outcome
flowering of scionse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G A or GA + zeatin treatments increased flowering of scions grown from the treated apices after grafting to untreated mature trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol did not induce flowering in one or two year old seedlings.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
one or two year old seedlingse0
Treatment
(2RS, 3RS)-paclobutrazole0
Outcome
failed to induce floweringe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of one or two year old seedlings with (2RS, 3RS)-paclobutrazol failed to induce flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment stimulated flowering in three or four year old plants.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
three or four year old plantse0
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of three or four year old plants did stimulate flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling did not affect flowering in three year old plants.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Branch or stem girdlinge0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Branch or stem girdling or root flooding applied alone or in combination to three year old plants did not affect flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root flooding did not affect flowering in three year old plants.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
root floodinge0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Branch or stem girdling or root flooding applied alone or in combination to three year old plants did not affect flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GAs inhibited floral initiation in three or four year old plants.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
treatment with GAse0
Outcome
Floral initiatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Floral initiation by three or four year old plants was inhibited by treatment with GAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer a root-produced, xylem-transported graft-transmissible flowering inhibitor in seedlings.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
initiation of otherwise competent meristemse0
Qualifier
root- produced, xylem transported, graft-transmissible inhibitor(s)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root- produced, xylem transported, graft-transmissible inhibitor(s), which control the initiation of otherwise competent meristems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior GA treatment did not affect juvenile meristem competence to flower.

Taxon
Prunus aviumPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
prior GA treatmente0
Outcome
Juvenile meristem competence to flowere0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Juvenile meristem competence to flower was not affected by prior GA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Prunus avium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · phenology · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · pest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

pruning · phenology · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.