Paper · 2024 · Știința Agricolă

The impact of the pruning time on the yield and size of sweet cherries of the Stella and Skeena varieties grafted on MaxMa 14

Valerian Balan; Vasile Sarban

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study investigates the effects of pruning time on sweet cherry trees (Prunus avium L.) of Stella and Skeena varieties, grafted on MaxMa 14 rootstock, planted at a spacing distance of 5 x 3 m in the central region of the Republic of Moldova in 2012. Trees with naturally improved crowns of reduced volume were used. Four pruning schedules were tested: dormant period pruning (control group), pruning during flowering, post-harvest pruning (in July), and early autumn pruning (first decade of September). Phenological characteristics of sweet cherry varieties, trunk diameter increment, crop yield, and fruit distribution by diameter were assessed. Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth, but significantly influenced fruit quality and yield. Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter. Further research during the growing season should focus on evaluating the impact of pruning time on yield, fruit diameter, fruit mass, and fruit distribution by commercial size.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning time did not significantly affect flowering onset or duration.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Pruning timee0
Outcome
onset and duration of floweringe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning time did not significantly affect trunk growth.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Pruning timee0
Outcome
trunk growthe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning time significantly affected fruit quality.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Pruning timee2
Outcome
fruit qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly influenced fruit quality and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pruning time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning time significantly affected yield.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Pruning timee2
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly influenced fruit quality and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pruning time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early autumn pruning reduced small-fruit counts.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Early autumn pruninge0
Outcome
number of small fruitse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early autumn pruning increased yield of fruit larger than 28 mm.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
Early autumn pruninge0
Outcome
yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–70 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

pruning · phenology · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.