Abstract
The study investigates the effects of pruning time on sweet cherry trees (Prunus avium L.) of Stella and Skeena varieties, grafted on MaxMa 14 rootstock, planted at a spacing distance of 5 x 3 m in the central region of the Republic of Moldova in 2012. Trees with naturally improved crowns of reduced volume were used. Four pruning schedules were tested: dormant period pruning (control group), pruning during flowering, post-harvest pruning (in July), and early autumn pruning (first decade of September). Phenological characteristics of sweet cherry varieties, trunk diameter increment, crop yield, and fruit distribution by diameter were assessed. Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth, but significantly influenced fruit quality and yield. Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter. Further research during the growing season should focus on evaluating the impact of pruning time on yield, fruit diameter, fruit mass, and fruit distribution by commercial size.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning time did not significantly affect flowering onset or duration.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Pruning timee0
- Outcome
- onset and duration of floweringe0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth”
t0“sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning time did not significantly affect trunk growth.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Pruning timee0
- Outcome
- trunk growthe0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pruning time had no significant effect on the onset and duration of flowering or trunk growth”
t0“sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning time significantly affected fruit quality.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Pruning timee2
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly influenced fruit quality and yield”
t0“sweet cherries”
e2“Pruning time”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning time significantly affected yield.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Pruning timee2
- Outcome
- yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly influenced fruit quality and yield”
t0“sweet cherries”
e2“Pruning time”
Claim · model-written summary
Early autumn pruning reduced small-fruit counts.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Early autumn pruninge0
- Outcome
- number of small fruitse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter.”
t0“sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Early autumn pruning increased yield of fruit larger than 28 mm.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Early autumn pruninge0
- Outcome
- yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diametere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Early autumn pruning reduced the number of small fruits and increased the yield of fruits larger than 28 mm in diameter.”
t0“sweet cherries”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →pruning · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →pruning · phenology · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.