Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 2002, each thinning treatment nearly eliminated the yield of small sweet cherry fruit compared to the control.

A claim from Chemical Blossom Thinners Vary in Their Effect on Sweet Cherry Fruit Set, Yield, Fruit Quality, and Crop Value · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, each thinning treatment nearly eliminated the yield of small sweet cherry fruit compared to the control.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Treatment
each thinning treatmente7
Outcome
yield of the small fruite7
Direction
nearly eliminatede7
Qualifier
In 2002e7
Comparator
Ce6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper reports on sweet cherry chemical blossom thinning trials conducted in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–507
e7

“In 2002, each thinning treatment nearly eliminated the yield of the small fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1342
e6

“by more than 400%, compared to C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1441

Title

Chemical Blossom Thinners Vary in Their Effect on Sweet Cherry Fruit Set, Yield, Fruit Quality, and Crop Value

Matthew D. Whiting; David Ophardt; James R. McFerson HortTechnology 2006. doi:10.21273/horttech.16.1.0066

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-2782cae07b3ce14b38a11bd7884131f02eae6a421734b93c407e1c903d9bf69d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.