Abstract
For over 25 years, rootstocks for sweet cherries are evaluated in different locations in the german federal state of Rhenania Palatinate. They are situated in a vine growing climate and have medium-heavy soils. Replant disease of stone fruit plays a significant role in most orchards. In general, all trees in the rootstock trials are trained as central leader and planted 4.0 to 4.5 m by 2.0 to 3.0 m depending on the expected vigour. In addition to the common performance parameters, tree health, anchorage and tendency for root suckers are observed. In 2013 a new rootstock trial has been established including, inter alia, the new Weigi series and some recent Gisela numbers. In the experimental orchard of Oppenheim, replanted soil can be compared to new land. Up to now, Weigi 2 is slightly more dwarfing but also less productive in this trial what is no disadvantage regarding the fruit size. In the group of semi-dwarfing rootstocks Weigi 1, Weigi 3, Gisela 13 and Gisela 17 seem to be similar both in vigour and yield efficiency. In this group there is an interest to replace PiKu 1 which turned out to be not winter hardy enough and susceptible to heavy soils and bark beetles under German conditions. Training trials revealed that also with low tree forms, yields and qualities comparable to the spindle can be obtained. The picking performance can be improved in many cases. Mechanical pruning only makes sense if it is combined with manual correction pruning. An exclusive mechanical pruning reduces the fruit size and can also reduce the picking performance.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Weigi 2 was slightly more dwarfing in the rootstock trial.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Material
- Weigi 2e0
- Outcome
- dwarfinge0
- Direction
- moree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weigi 2 is slightly more dwarfing but also less productive in this trial”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Weigi 2 was less productive in the rootstock trial.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Material
- Weigi 2e0
- Outcome
- productivee0
- Direction
- lesse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weigi 2 is slightly more dwarfing but also less productive in this trial”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
The lower productivity of Weigi 2 was not a disadvantage for fruit size.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Material
- Weigi 2e1
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- no disadvantagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“what is no disadvantage regarding the fruit size”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
e1“Weigi 2”
Claim · model-written summary
Weigi 1, Weigi 3, Gisela 13 and Gisela 17 appeared similar in vigour and yield efficiency.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Outcome
- vigour and yield efficiencye0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Weigi 1, Weigi 3, Gisela 13 and Gisela 17 seem to be similar both in vigour and yield efficiency”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
PiKu 1 was insufficiently winter hardy and susceptible to heavy soils and bark beetles under German conditions.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Material
- PiKu 1e0
- Outcome
- not winter hardy enough and susceptible to heavy soils and bark beetlese0
- Setting
- German conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“PiKu 1 which turned out to be not winter hardy enough and susceptible to heavy soils and bark beetles under German conditions”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Low tree forms produced yields and qualities comparable to spindle training.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- low tree formse0
- Outcome
- yields and qualitiese0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- spindlee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“also with low tree forms, yields and qualities comparable to the spindle can be obtained”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Picking performance improved in many cases.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Outcome
- picking performancee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The picking performance can be improved in many cases”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechanical pruning was recommended only with manual correction pruning.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Outcome
- Mechanical pruning only makes sense if it is combined with manual correction pruninge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Mechanical pruning only makes sense if it is combined with manual correction pruning”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Exclusive mechanical pruning reduced fruit size.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- exclusive mechanical pruninge0
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
- Direction
- reducese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“An exclusive mechanical pruning reduces the fruit size”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
Claim · model-written summary
Exclusive mechanical pruning could reduce picking performance.
- Taxon
- sweet cherries
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- exclusive mechanical pruninge0
- Outcome
- picking performancee0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“An exclusive mechanical pruning reduces the fruit size and can also reduce the picking performance”
t0“rootstocks for sweet cherries”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.