Paper · 1932 · Shokubutsugaku Zasshi

Chromosome Studies in Lilium. I

Masayosi Sat^|^ocirc

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

(1) The somatic number of chromosomes of the genus Lilium are determined in the present study as follows;2n=24, L. philippinepse var. formosanum, L. avratam., L. auratum var. hamaonum, L. davuricum, L. davuricum var. venustwm, L. davuricvm subsp. Thunbergianum, L. concolor var. pulchellum f. miniatum, L. concolor var. pulchellum, f. partheneion, L. concolor var. pulchellum f. coridion, L. speciosum, L. speciosum f. rubrum, L. speciosum var. tairnetomo, L. Henryi, L. amabile, L. cernuum, L. medeoloides.2n=26, L. japonicum.2n=86, L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno.(2) In the root-tip cells of L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno 36 chromosomes were invariably counted, 6 of which were larger among them 3 have median fiber-attachment and the other have submedian. The remaining 30 shorter chromosomes are of either the terminal or sub-terminal class. This plant is probably the triploid form as L. tiyrinum.(3) The number 26 of L. japonicum is a new number among those found in the genus Lilimn, there being a pair of markedly small chromosomes. These small chromosomes are probably the fragments formed as a result of segmentation at the points of transverse sulture or constriction.(4) The length of chromosomes was measured in L. philippinense var. formosanum, L. japonicum and L. speciosum; it was confirmed that in these species there is always a constant length difference among the chromosomes.(5) From the result of calculation nearly the same total value of the sum of chromosomes lengths was obtained and the relative length of chromosomes to the total sum of the chromosome lengths shows no significant difference in corresponding chromosomes among these species.These results may throw light on the phylogenetic relation between the species from the view point of chromosome morphology.For part of the materials used and for the helpful interest and advice thoughout.the course of the work, the writer is imdebted to Dr. Y. SiNOTÔ under whose direction the investigation has been carried on.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen listed Lilium taxa had 2n=24 chromosomes.

Taxon
LiliumLiliumt0
Outcome
2n=24e0
Value
2n=24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2n=24, L. philippinepse var. formosanum, L. avratam., L. auratum var. hamaonum, L. davuricum, L. davuricum var. venustwm, L. davuricvm subsp. Thunbergianum, L. concolor var. pulchellum f. miniatum, L. concolor var. pulchellum, f. partheneion, L. concolor var. pulchellum f. coridion, L. speciosum, L. speciosum f. rubrum, L. speciosum var. tairnetomo, L. Henryi, L. amabile, L. cernuum, L. medeoloides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. japonicum had 2n=26 chromosomes, a new number for the genus.

Taxon
L. japonicumLilium japonicume0
Outcome
2n=26e0
Value
2n=26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium japonicum
Lilium japonicum · TaxonMotohiro Sunouchi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2n=26, L. japonicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno was listed with 2n=86 chromosomes.

Taxon
L. tigrinum var. flore-plenoLilium lancifoliume0
Outcome
2n=86e0
Value
2n=86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium lancifolium
Lilium lancifolium · TaxonAndrew Van Houten. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2n=86, L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–562 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tip cells of L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno consistently contained 36 chromosomes.

Taxon
L. tigrinum var. flore-plenoLilium lancifoliume0
Organ / stage
root-tip cellse0
Outcome
chromosomese0
Value
36 chromosomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium lancifolium
Lilium lancifolium · TaxonAndrew Van Houten. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the root-tip cells of L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno 36 chromosomes were invariably counted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–659 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six of the 36 chromosomes were larger; three had median and three submedian fiber attachment.

Taxon
L. tigrinum var. flore-plenoLilium lancifoliume1
Outcome
largere0
Value
6e0
Qualifier
3 have median fiber-attachment and the other have submediane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium lancifolium
Lilium lancifolium · TaxonAndrew Van Houten. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 of which were larger among them 3 have median fiber-attachment and the other have submedian”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno 36 chromosomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining 30 shorter chromosomes were terminal or subterminal.

Taxon
L. tigrinum var. flore-plenoLilium lancifoliume1
Outcome
shorter chromosomese0
Value
30e0
Qualifier
terminal or sub-terminal classe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium lancifolium
Lilium lancifolium · TaxonAndrew Van Houten. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining 30 shorter chromosomes are of either the terminal or sub-terminal class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–841 · show in text ↑
e1

“L. tigrinum var. flore-pleno 36 chromosomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. japonicum had a pair of markedly small chromosomes.

Taxon
L. japonicumLilium japonicume0
Outcome
a pair of markedly small chromosomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium japonicum
Lilium japonicum · TaxonMotohiro Sunouchi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number 26 of L. japonicum is a new number among those found in the genus Lilimn, there being a pair of markedly small chromosomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1036 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The small chromosomes of L. japonicum were interpreted as possible segmentation fragments.

Taxon
L. japonicumLilium japonicume1
Outcome
small chromosomese0
Qualifier
segmentation at the points of transverse sulture or constrictione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium japonicum
Lilium japonicum · TaxonMotohiro Sunouchi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These small chromosomes are probably the fragments formed as a result of segmentation at the points of transverse sulture or constriction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“L. japonicum is a new number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromosomes differed consistently in length within L. philippinense var. formosanum, L. japonicum and L. speciosum.

Taxon
L. philippinense var. formosanum, L. japonicum and L. speciosumLilium speciosumLilium japonicumLilium philippinensee0
Outcome
constant length difference among the chromosomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium speciosum
Lilium speciosum · Taxon‘Uncle Carl’ (カールおじさん). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lilium japonicum
Lilium japonicum · TaxonMotohiro Sunouchi · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lilium philippinense
Lilium philippinense · TaxonDarm Crook · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of chromosomes was measured in L. philippinense var. formosanum, L. japonicum and L. speciosum; it was confirmed that in these species there is always a constant length difference among the chromosomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1392 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three species had nearly equal summed chromosome lengths.

Taxon
LiliumLiliumt0
Outcome
total value of the sum of chromosomes lengthse0
Direction
nearly the samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nearly the same total value of the sum of chromosomes lengths was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corresponding chromosomes did not differ significantly in relative length among the species.

Taxon
LiliumLiliumt0
Outcome
relative length of chromosomese0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lilium
Lilium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Foto von Marty Lucas, per Email an mich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative length of chromosomes to the total sum of the chromosome lengths shows no significant difference in corresponding chromosomes among these species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lilium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28 · show in text ↑