Paper · 1983 · Journal of Horticultural Science

New fungicides for suppression of sporulation byMonilinia fructicolafrom overwintering sites in peach trees in spring

P. F. Kable

7
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummarySpore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit. Several fungicides were evaluated for suppression of spore production. Production was suppressed by >90% by benomyl (250 ppm), procymidone (500 ppm) and vinclozolin (500 ppm). Iprodione (375 ppm) was moderately effective in two separate tests, suppressing spore production from infected peduncles by 39% and 83% and from mummified fruits by 89% and 98.8%. Etaconazole (500 ppm), triadimefon (500 ppm), fenarimol (250 ppm), fenapanil (500 ppm), bitertanol (250 ppm), propiconazole (60 ppm), imazilil (500–3000 ppm) and prochloraz (500 ppm) were relatively ineffective. Benomyl (250 ppm) did not effectively suppress sporulation of a benomyl-tolerant form of M. fructicola. The use of procymidone and vinclozolin as alternatives to benomyl for the suppression of overwintering inoculum is discussed in relation to the likelihood that forms of the pathogen tolerant to all three fungicides will eventually dominate orchard populations repeatedly exposed to them. Strategies for delaying this eventuality are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl, procymidone and vinclozolin suppressed Monilinia fructicola spore production by more than 90%.

Treatment
benomyl (250 ppm), procymidone (500 ppm) and vinclozolin (500 ppm)e1
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
spore productione0
Direction
suppressede1
Value
>90%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Production was suppressed by >90% by benomyl (250 ppm), procymidone (500 ppm) and vinclozolin (500 ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione moderately suppressed Monilinia fructicola spore production from infected peduncles by 39% and 83%.

Organ / stage
infected pedunclese2
Treatment
Iprodione (375 ppm)e2
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
spore productione0
Direction
suppressinge2
Value
39% and 83%e2
Qualifier
moderately effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Iprodione (375 ppm) was moderately effective in two separate tests, suppressing spore production from infected peduncles by 39% and 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione suppressed Monilinia fructicola spore production from mummified fruit by 89% and 98.8%.

Organ / stage
mummified fruitse3
Treatment
Iprodione (375 ppm)e2
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
spore productione0
Direction
suppressinge3
Value
89% and 98.8%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Iprodione (375 ppm) was moderately effective in two separate tests, suppressing spore production from infected peduncles by 39% and 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–441 · show in text ↑
e3

“suppressing spore production from infected peduncles by 39% and 83% and from mummified fruits by 89% and 98.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Etaconazole, triadimefon and fenarimol were relatively ineffective at suppressing Monilinia fructicola spore production.

Treatment
Etaconazole (500 ppm), triadimefon (500 ppm), fenarimol (250 ppm)e4
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
suppression of spore productione5
Direction
relatively ineffectivee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“Etaconazole (500 ppm), triadimefon (500 ppm), fenarimol (250 ppm), fenapanil (500 ppm), bitertanol (250 ppm), propiconazole (60 ppm), imazilil (500–3000 ppm) and prochloraz (500 ppm) were relatively ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–696 · show in text ↑
e5

“Several fungicides were evaluated for suppression of spore production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenapanil, bitertanol and propiconazole were relatively ineffective at suppressing Monilinia fructicola spore production.

Treatment
fenapanil (500 ppm), bitertanol (250 ppm), propiconazole (60 ppm)e4
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
suppression of spore productione5
Direction
relatively ineffectivee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“Etaconazole (500 ppm), triadimefon (500 ppm), fenarimol (250 ppm), fenapanil (500 ppm), bitertanol (250 ppm), propiconazole (60 ppm), imazilil (500–3000 ppm) and prochloraz (500 ppm) were relatively ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–696 · show in text ↑
e5

“Several fungicides were evaluated for suppression of spore production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazilil and prochloraz were relatively ineffective at suppressing Monilinia fructicola spore production.

Treatment
imazilil (500–3000 ppm) and prochloraz (500 ppm)e4
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
suppression of spore productione5
Direction
relatively ineffectivee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spore production by Monilinia fructicola occurs in spring from overwintering sites on peach peduncles and mummified fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“Etaconazole (500 ppm), triadimefon (500 ppm), fenarimol (250 ppm), fenapanil (500 ppm), bitertanol (250 ppm), propiconazole (60 ppm), imazilil (500–3000 ppm) and prochloraz (500 ppm) were relatively ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–696 · show in text ↑
e5

“Several fungicides were evaluated for suppression of spore production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl at 250 ppm did not effectively suppress sporulation of a benomyl-tolerant form of Monilinia fructicola.

Material
benomyl-tolerant form of M. fructicolae6
Treatment
Benomyl (250 ppm)e6
Interactor
M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae6pathogen
Outcome
sporulatione6
Direction
did not effectively suppresse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“overwintering sites in peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e6

“Benomyl (250 ppm) did not effectively suppress sporulation of a benomyl-tolerant form of M. fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–800 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

propiconazole · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

iprodione · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.