benomyl · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)
8 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Eradicant action of fungicides applied to dormant peach trees for control of brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) (1970)
decreaseBenomyl effectively suppressed sporulation of Monilinia fructicola from infected peach peduncles and mummified peach fruits.
New fungicides for suppression of sporulation byMonilinia fructicolafrom overwintering sites in peach trees in spring (1983)no changeBenomyl at 250 ppm did not effectively suppress sporulation of a benomyl-tolerant form of Monilinia fructicola.
What separates themSituation: pathogen infection · not statedCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 4
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Control of brown rot and transit rot of peaches with post-harvest fungicidal dips. · 1980
- positive
- positive
- negative
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.