Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)

1. benomylResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. azoxystrobinPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. captanPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. ethanolPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. boscalidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. pyraclostrobinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. sulfur atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. thiophanate-methylPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. iprodioneResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. propiconazoleResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
11. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. tebuconazoleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. Trichothecium roseumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. hexanalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. trifloxystrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. botanicalPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
21. lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. fungicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. limePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. uvResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.