Paper · 2013 · Plant Disease

Field Strains of Monilinia fructicola Resistant to Both MBC and DMI Fungicides Isolated from Stone Fruit Orchards in the Eastern United States

F. Chen; X. Liu; G. Schnabel

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
84
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 2012, significant brown rot disease was observed on stone fruit in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and South Carolina despite preharvest application of methyl benzimidazole carbamate (MBC) and demethylase inhibitor (DMI) fungicides. In total, 140 Monilinia fructicola isolates were collected from diseased orchards and examined for fungicide sensitivity. In addition to isolates resistant to either the DMI propiconazole or the MBC thiophanate-methyl, 22 isolates were discovered that were resistant to both fungicides, including 4 isolates from peach in South Carolina, 12 isolates from peach and sweet cherry in Maryland, and 6 isolates from sweet cherry in Pennsylvania. Analysis of MBC resistance revealed that dual-resistant isolates from South Carolina carried the β-tubulin E198A mutation, whereas isolates from Maryland and Pennsylvania carried E198 mutations not previously described in the Monilinia genus, E198Q or F200Y. The genetic element Mona, associated with DMI fungicide resistance in M. fructicola, was detected in the dual-resistant isolates from South Carolina but not in the isolates from the two more northern states. An investigation into the molecular mechanism of DMI resistance in the latter isolates revealed that resistance was not based on increased expression or mutation of MfCYP51, which encodes the target of DMI fungicides. Label rates of formulated propiconazole or thiophanate-methyl were unable to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit, confirming field relevance of dual resistance. The same isolates were not affected by fitness penalties based on mycelial growth rate, ability to sporulate, and virulence on detached peach fruit. The emergence of M. fructicola strains resistant to both DMI and MBC fungicides in multiple states and multiple stone fruit crops is a significant development and needs to be considered when designing resistance management strategies in stone fruit orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown rot remained significant on stone fruit despite MBC and DMI applications in three states.

Taxon
stone fruite0
Treatment
preharvest application of methyl benzimidazole carbamate (MBC) and demethylase inhibitor (DMI) fungicidese0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot diseasee0
Setting
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and South Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant brown rot disease was observed on stone fruit in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and South Carolina despite preharvest application of methyl benzimidazole carbamate (MBC) and demethylase inhibitor (DMI) fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Resistant to Both MBC and DMI Fungicides Isolated from Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two isolates were resistant to both fungicides.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
isolates were discovered that were resistant to both fungicidese0
Value
22 isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“22 isolates were discovered that were resistant to both fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Resistant to Both MBC and DMI Fungicides Isolated from Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four dual-resistant isolates came from peach in South Carolina.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
isolatese0
Value
4 isolatese0
Setting
South Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 isolates from peach in South Carolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve dual-resistant isolates came from peach and sweet cherry in Maryland.

Taxon
peach and sweet cherryPrunus persicaPrunus aviume0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
isolatese0
Value
12 isolatese0
Setting
Marylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12 isolates from peach and sweet cherry in Maryland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six dual-resistant isolates came from sweet cherry in Pennsylvania.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
isolatese0
Value
6 isolatese0
Setting
Pennsylvaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 isolates from sweet cherry in Pennsylvania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

South Carolina dual-resistant isolates carried β-tubulin E198A.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Gene
β-tubulin E198Ae0
Outcome
carried the β-tubulin E198A mutatione0
Setting
South Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual-resistant isolates from South Carolina carried the β-tubulin E198A mutation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Resistant to Both MBC and DMI Fungicides Isolated from Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maryland and Pennsylvania isolates carried previously undescribed E198Q or F200Y mutations.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
MoniliniaMoniliniae0pathogen
Gene
E198Q or F200Ye0
Outcome
E198 mutations not previously described in the Monilinia genuse0
Setting
Maryland and Pennsylvaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia
Monilinia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryShuhrataxmedov · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolates from Maryland and Pennsylvania carried E198 mutations not previously described in the Monilinia genus, E198Q or F200Y.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1921–1941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mona was detected in South Carolina dual-resistant isolates.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Gene
Monae0
Outcome
detected in the dual-resistant isolatese0
Setting
South Carolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genetic element Mona, associated with DMI fungicide resistance in M. fructicola, was detected in the dual-resistant isolates from South Carolina but not in the isolates from the two more northern states.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1921–1941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mona was absent from the northern dual-resistant isolates.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Gene
Monae0
Outcome
not in the isolates from the two more northern statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genetic element Mona, associated with DMI fungicide resistance in M. fructicola, was detected in the dual-resistant isolates from South Carolina but not in the isolates from the two more northern states.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1921–1941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMI resistance in northern isolates was not based on increased MfCYP51 expression or mutation.

Taxon
Stone Fruitt0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Gene
MfCYP51e0
Outcome
resistance was not based on increased expression or mutatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance was not based on increased expression or mutation of MfCYP51”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Resistant to Both MBC and DMI Fungicides Isolated from Stone Fruit Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Label-rate propiconazole failed to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit.

Organ / stage
detached peach fruite0
Treatment
propiconazolee0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
control dual-resistant isolatese0
Direction
unablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Label rates of formulated propiconazole or thiophanate-methyl were unable to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Label-rate thiophanate-methyl failed to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit.

Organ / stage
detached peach fruite0
Treatment
thiophanate-methyle0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
control dual-resistant isolatese0
Direction
unablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Label rates of formulated propiconazole or thiophanate-methyl were unable to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual-resistant isolates showed no fitness penalties in growth, sporulation, or virulence on peach fruit.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Outcome
fitness penalties based on mycelial growth rate, ability to sporulate, and virulencee0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same isolates were not affected by fitness penalties based on mycelial growth rate, ability to sporulate, and virulence on detached peach fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–262 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance management in stone-fruit orchards should account for dual fungicide resistance.

Taxon
stone fruite0
Outcome
resistance management strategiese0

Verbatim

e0

“needs to be considered when designing resistance management strategies in stone fruit orchards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1942 · show in text ↑

thiophanate-methyl · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propiconazole · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.