Claim · model-written summary
Resistance management in stone-fruit orchards should account for dual fungicide resistance.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“needs to be considered when designing resistance management strategies in stone fruit orchards.”
Title
F. Chen; X. Liu; G. Schnabel Plant Disease 2013. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-12-1177-re
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Brown rot remained significant on stone fruit despite MBC and DMI applications in three states.
- Observation Twenty-two isolates were resistant to both fungicides.
- Observation Four dual-resistant isolates came from peach in South Carolina.
- Observation Twelve dual-resistant isolates came from peach and sweet cherry in Maryland.
- Observation Six dual-resistant isolates came from sweet cherry in Pennsylvania.
- Observation South Carolina dual-resistant isolates carried β-tubulin E198A.
- Observation Maryland and Pennsylvania isolates carried previously undescribed E198Q or F200Y mutations.
- Observation Mona was detected in South Carolina dual-resistant isolates.
- Observation Mona was absent from the northern dual-resistant isolates.
- Observation DMI resistance in northern isolates was not based on increased MfCYP51 expression or mutation.
- Intervention effect Label-rate propiconazole failed to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit.
- Intervention effect Label-rate thiophanate-methyl failed to control dual-resistant isolates on detached peach fruit.
- Observation Dual-resistant isolates showed no fitness penalties in growth, sporulation, or virulence on peach fruit.