Paper · 2015 · Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides

Nivedita Mishra Krishna Sundari S

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Modern sustainable agricultural practices prefer to use biological agents for plant growth promotion, biocontrol and bioremediation as these are cost effective and eco-friendly. Our present study aims to investigate the effects of direct inoculation of selected consortia on plants to study its effects on supporting plant growth in the presence of root pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii and organophosphate pesticides Malathion (ML) and Methyl Parathion (MP). Candidate Plant Growth Promoting Microbial (PGPM) isolates chosen for the study are two bacterial isolates (PGPM2 a diazotrophic bacterium, PGPM9 a fluorescent Pseudomonad) and one fungal species (T103 a biocontrol fungus), originating from native agricultural fields of western U.P., India. Host plants inoculated with individual species showed a distributed growth enhancement pattern i.e., while isolate T103 improved root biomass, isolate PGPM9 enriched photosynthetic pigment content and isolate PGPM2 expanded root and shoot lengths. It appeared as though individual isolates showed a preference to enhance certain parameters over the other rather than exhibiting a uniform increment in all growth parameters. This preference to specific growth parameter over the other waned off in consortium studies where Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control. Selected consortia combination was able to provide better growth promotion in presence of pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii registering 58% increase in total biomass content while individual inoculation of biocontrol fungus T103 showed only 36% improvement. Selected consortia were also effective in plant growth promotion in presence of organophosphate pesticides ML and MP. More than two fold amplification was registered in all roots and shoot growth parameters studied when consortia was provided with ML and 28% increase was recorded when MP treatment was countered with consortia inoculation. All these results affirms our hypothesis that synergistic action of carefully selected PGPMs can escalate the benefits of plant growth promotion even in presence of pathogen and pesticide, hence this consortia may be a valuable option for sustained plant growth in modern agriculture systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T103 improved root biomass in host plants.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
isolate T103e0
Interactor
T103e0symbiont
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolate T103 improved root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPM9 increased photosynthetic pigment content.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
isolate PGPM9e0
Interactor
PGPM9e0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment contente0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolate PGPM9 enriched photosynthetic pigment content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPM2 increased root and shoot lengths.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
isolate PGPM2e0
Interactor
PGPM2e0symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot lengthse0
Direction
expandede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolate PGPM2 expanded root and shoot lengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation almost doubled sorghum root and shoot lengths and biomass relative to uninoculated controls.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
inoculated with the consortiume0
Outcome
root length, shoot length and overall biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
almost 2-folde0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation increased total chlorophyll 23% relative to uninoculated controls.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
inoculated with the consortiume0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
risee0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation increased biomass 58% in the presence of Sclerotium rolfsii.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Selected consortia combinatione0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Outcome
total biomass contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
individual inoculation of biocontrol fungus T103e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selected consortia combination was able to provide better growth promotion in presence of pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii registering 58% increase in total biomass content while individual inoculation of biocontrol fungus T103 showed only 36% improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T103 alone improved biomass 36% under pathogen pressure.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
inoculation of biocontrol fungus T103e0
Interactor
T103e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
improvemente0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual inoculation of biocontrol fungus T103 showed only 36% improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus Malathion more than doubled root and shoot growth parameters.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
consortia was provided with MLe0
Outcome
roots and shoot growth parameterse0
Direction
amplificatione0
Value
More than two folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More than two fold amplification was registered in all roots and shoot growth parameters studied when consortia was provided with ML”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium with methyl parathion increased growth 28%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
MP treatment was countered with consortia inoculatione0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“28% increase was recorded when MP treatment was countered with consortia inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2046–2130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Native PGPM Consortium: A Beneficial Solution to Support Plant Growth in the Presence of Phytopathogens and Residual Organophosphate Pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum bicolor inoculated with the consortium registered almost 2-fold increase in all parameters viz., root length, shoot length and overall biomass (root, shoot and total biomass) along with 23% rise in total chlorophyll content as compared to un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1537 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.