Paper · 1993 · Plant Disease

Comparative Efficacy and Systemic Activity of Iprodione and the Experimental Anilide E-0858 for Control of Brown Rot on Peach Fruit

Juan M. Osorio

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Iprodione, benomyl, or the experimental anilide E-0858 (SC-0858), when used as a pre- or postharvest spray, limited the size of brown rot lesions on fruit of the peach cultivar Elegant Lady inoculated with conidia of Monifinia fructicola. Fungicides applied 21, 14, 7, or 1 day before harvest reduced lesion diameters on inoculated fruit in postharvest storage compared with nontreated fruit. Brown rot lesions on fruit treated with E-0858 were significantly smaller than those on fruit treated with the other two fungicides. Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated water after fungicide treatment reduced the efficacy of iprodione or benomyl but not the efficacy of E-0858

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iprodione spray limited brown rot lesions on peach fruit.

Treatment
Iprodionee0
Interactor
Monifinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
size of brown rot lesionse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione, benomyl, or the experimental anilide E-0858 (SC-0858), when used as a pre- or postharvest spray, limited the size of brown rot lesions on fruit of the peach cultivar Elegant Lady inoculated with conidia of Monifinia fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl spray limited brown rot lesions on peach fruit.

Treatment
benomyle0
Interactor
Monifinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
size of brown rot lesionse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione, benomyl, or the experimental anilide E-0858 (SC-0858), when used as a pre- or postharvest spray, limited the size of brown rot lesions on fruit of the peach cultivar Elegant Lady inoculated with conidia of Monifinia fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E-0858 spray limited brown rot lesions on peach fruit.

Treatment
E-0858e0
Interactor
Monifinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
size of brown rot lesionse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iprodione, benomyl, or the experimental anilide E-0858 (SC-0858), when used as a pre- or postharvest spray, limited the size of brown rot lesions on fruit of the peach cultivar Elegant Lady inoculated with conidia of Monifinia fructicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest fungicides reduced lesion diameters versus untreated fruit.

Treatment
Fungicides applied 21, 14, 7, or 1 day before harveste0
Outcome
lesion diameterse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides applied 21, 14, 7, or 1 day before harvest reduced lesion diameters on inoculated fruit in postharvest storage compared with nontreated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

E-0858 produced significantly smaller lesions than the other fungicides.

Treatment
E-0858e0
Outcome
Brown rot lesionse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
the other two fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brown rot lesions on fruit treated with E-0858 were significantly smaller than those on fruit treated with the other two fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrocooling reduced iprodione efficacy.

Treatment
Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated watere0
Outcome
efficacy of iprodionee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated water after fungicide treatment reduced the efficacy of iprodione or benomyl but not the efficacy of E-0858”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrocooling reduced benomyl efficacy.

Treatment
Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated watere0
Outcome
efficacy of iprodione or benomyle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated water after fungicide treatment reduced the efficacy of iprodione or benomyl but not the efficacy of E-0858”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrocooling did not reduce E-0858 efficacy.

Treatment
Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated watere0
Outcome
efficacy of E-0858e0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated water after fungicide treatment reduced the efficacy of iprodione or benomyl but not the efficacy of E-0858”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑

benomyl · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fungicide · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.