Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hydrocooling did not reduce E-0858 efficacy.

A claim from Comparative Efficacy and Systemic Activity of Iprodione and the Experimental Anilide E-0858 for Control of Brown Rot on Peach Fruit · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrocooling did not reduce E-0858 efficacy.

Treatment
Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated watere0
Outcome
efficacy of E-0858e0
Direction
note0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postharvest hydrocooling using chlorinated water after fungicide treatment reduced the efficacy of iprodione or benomyl but not the efficacy of E-0858”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–676
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125

Title

Comparative Efficacy and Systemic Activity of Iprodione and the Experimental Anilide E-0858 for Control of Brown Rot on Peach Fruit

Juan M. Osorio Plant Disease 1993. doi:10.1094/pd-77-1140

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2c01fa648ab5f7e3bf9a056a9ad72c1ecc99d65dcc7a783b1115eca76f805236 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer