Paper · 1992 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Interspecific Differences in the Mechanism of Drought Tolerance among Four Cereal Crops.

Katsumi INADA; Asana MATSUURA; Masakatsu YAMANE

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Interspecific differences in drought tolerance were studied by two solution- and one field-culture experiments in a glasshouse using Japanese millet, sorghum, pearl millet and maize. Water stress treatment for the solution culture was achieved by adding polyethylene glycol 6000 to the solution at a final concentration of 200g/1000g H2O, producing a -0.93 MPa osmotic potential, while that for the field experiment was by suspension of watering. The treatment was made for about two weeks in the vegetative growth stage. Growth parameters and leaf water status were determined at the beginning, during and after the treatment. Dry weight of plant was generally decreased less by stress in pearl millet and sorghum, while the recovery after removal of stress was faster in sorghum and Japanese millet than in the other opecies. Osmotic potential (π) as against water potential (Ψ) in stressed leaves decreased more than in the control, except for maize. The decreasing order of relative water content with a decrease of either Ψ or π was as follows : maize>Japanese millet>sorghum>pearl millet. Osmotic adjustment (OA) increased in the following order : sorghum>Japanese millet>pearl millet>maize. From these results, we concluded that sorghum and Japanese millet, especially sorghum, possess a higher dehydration tolerance due to a higher OA and pearl millet due to a larger water retention ability, whereas maize easily wilts because of a smaller OA and water retention ability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress decreased dry weight less in pearl millet and sorghum.

Taxon
pearl millet and sorghumCenchrus americanusSorghume0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
Dry weight of plante0
Direction
decreased lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight of plant was generally decreased less by stress in pearl millet and sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–714 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum and Japanese millet recovered faster after stress removal.

Taxon
sorghum and Japanese milletSorghumEchinochloa frumentaceae0
Outcome
recovery after removal of stresse0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
other opeciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa frumentacea
Echinochloa frumentacea · TaxonJames Schnable · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recovery after removal of stress was faster in sorghum and Japanese millet than in the other opecies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stressed leaf osmotic potential decreased more than control except in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
stressede0
Outcome
Osmotic potential (π) as against water potential (Ψ)e0
Direction
decreased moree0
Qualifier
except for maizee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Osmotic potential (π) as against water potential (Ψ) in stressed leaves decreased more than in the control, except for maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–953 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content declined in the order maize, Japanese millet, sorghum, pearl millet as water or osmotic potential declined.

Taxon
maize>Japanese millet>sorghum>pearl milletEchinochloa frumentaceae0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
decrease of either Ψ or πe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa frumentacea
Echinochloa frumentacea · TaxonJames Schnable · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decreasing order of relative water content with a decrease of either Ψ or π was as follows : maize>Japanese millet>sorghum>pearl millet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic adjustment ranked sorghum, Japanese millet, pearl millet and maize.

Taxon
sorghum>Japanese millet>pearl millet>maizeEchinochloa frumentaceae0
Outcome
Osmotic adjustment (OA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa frumentacea
Echinochloa frumentacea · TaxonJames Schnable · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Osmotic adjustment (OA) increased in the following order : sorghum>Japanese millet>pearl millet>maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1197 · show in text ↑