Paper · 2014 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Evaluation of the Combination of Dimethyl Disulfide and Dazomet as an Efficient Methyl Bromide Alternative for Cucumber Production in China

Liangang Mao; Dongdong Yan; Qiuxia Wang; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The combination of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and dazomet (DZ) is a potential alternative to methyl bromide (MB) for soil disinfestation. The efficacy of DMDS plus DZ in controlling key soilborne pests was evaluated in a laboratory study and in two commercial cucumber greenhouses. Laboratory studies found that all of the combinations had positive synergistic effects on root-knot nematodes, two key soilborne fungi, and two major weed seeds. Greenhouse trials revealed that the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2)) successfully suppressed Meloidogyne spp. root galling, sharply reduced the colony-forming units of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. on media, maintained high cucumber yields, and was not significantly different from MB or DMDS alone, but better than DZ alone. All of the chemical treatments provided significantly better results than the nontreated control. The results indicate that the combination of DMDS and DZ is an efficient MB alternative for cucumber production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations of DMDS and DZ had positive synergistic effects on root-knot nematodes in the laboratory

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all of the combinationse1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
positive synergistic effects on root-knot nematodese1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
two key soilborne fungi, and two major weed seedse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“Laboratory studies found that all of the combinations had positive synergistic effects on root-knot nematodes, two key soilborne fungi, and two major weed seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of DMDS and DZ suppressed Meloidogyne root galling in greenhouse trials compared with the nontreated control

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2))e2
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee2pest
Outcome
Meloidogyne spp. root gallinge2
Direction
suppressede2
Comparator
nontreated controle5
Setting
Greenhouse trialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Greenhouse trials revealed that the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2)) successfully suppressed Meloidogyne spp. root galling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
e5

“All of the chemical treatments provided significantly better results than the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of DMDS and DZ sharply reduced colony-forming units of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. on media

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2))e2
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume3pathogen
Second interactor
Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae3pathogen
Outcome
colony-forming units of Fusarium spp.e3
Direction
sharply reducede3
Qualifier
on mediae3
Comparator
nontreated controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e2

“Greenhouse trials revealed that the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2)) successfully suppressed Meloidogyne spp. root galling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
e3

“sharply reduced the colony-forming units of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. on media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–667 · show in text ↑
e5

“All of the chemical treatments provided significantly better results than the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of DMDS and DZ maintained high cucumber yields, not significantly different from MB or DMDS alone

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse4
Treatment
the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2))e2
Outcome
cucumber yieldse4
Direction
maintained highe4
Comparator
MB or DMDS alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Greenhouse trials revealed that the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2)) successfully suppressed Meloidogyne spp. root galling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
e4

“maintained high cucumber yields, and was not significantly different from MB or DMDS alone, but better than DZ alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of DMDS and DZ gave better cucumber yields than DZ alone

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse4
Treatment
the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2))e2
Outcome
cucumber yieldse4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
DZ alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Greenhouse trials revealed that the combination of DMDS and DZ (30 + 25 g m(-2)) successfully suppressed Meloidogyne spp. root galling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–577 · show in text ↑
e4

“maintained high cucumber yields, and was not significantly different from MB or DMDS alone, but better than DZ alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All chemical treatments gave significantly better results than the nontreated control

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
All of the chemical treatmentse5
Outcome
resultse5
Direction
significantly bettere5
Comparator
nontreated controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber Production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e5

“All of the chemical treatments provided significantly better results than the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–883 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the combination of DMDS and DZ is an efficient methyl bromide alternative for cucumber production

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse6
Outcome
efficient MB alternativee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The results indicate that the combination of DMDS and DZ is an efficient MB alternative for cucumber production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–996 · show in text ↑

dimethyl disulfide · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

dazomet · Fusarium · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

dimethyl disulfide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

dazomet · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

dazomet · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.