Paper · 2019 · Scientific Reports

Assessment of the potential of a reduced dose of dimethyl disulfide plus metham sodium on soilborne pests and cucumber growth

Liangang Mao; Hongyun Jiang; Lan Zhang; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Methyl bromide (MB), a dominant ozone-depleting substance, is scheduled to be completely phased out for soil fumigation by December 30th 2018, in China. The combined effects of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) plus metham sodium (MNa) were assessed in controlling soilborne pests for soil fumigation. A study was designed in laboratory for the evaluation of the efficacy of DMDS + MNa to control major soilborne pests. At the same time, two trials were conducted in cucumber field located in Tongzhou (in 2012) and Shunyi (in 2013), respectively, in order to assess the potential of DMDS + MNa in controlling soilborne pests. Laboratory studies disclosed positive synergistic effects of almost all four used combinations on Meloidogyne spp., Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., Abutilon theophrasti and Digitaria sanguinalis . Field trials found that DMDS + MNa (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 ), both at a 50% reduced dose, effectively suppressed Meloidogyne spp. with a low root galling index (2.1% and 11.7%), significantly reduced the levels of Phytophthora and Fusarium spp. with a low root disease index (7.5% and 15.8%), gave very high cucumber yields (6.75 kg m −2 and 10.03 kg m −2 ), and increased income for cucumber growers with the highest economic benefits (20.91 ¥ m −2 and 23.58 ¥ m −2 ). The combination treatment provided similar results as MB standard dose treatment (40 g a. i. m −2 ) or DMDS standard dose treatment (60 g a. i. m −2 ) in pest control and yield, but was more effective than MNa standard dose treatment (42 g a. i. m −2 ). Usage of all chemical treatments gave better significant results than the untreated group of control. Considering the economic benefits, the DMDS plus MNa combination (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 ) could be used for soil fumigation in cucumber production in China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMDS plus MNa combinations showed positive synergism against Meloidogyne spp. in laboratory tests.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combinationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
Meloidogyne spp.e0
Direction
positive synergistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Laboratory studies disclosed positive synergistic effects of almost all four used combinations on Meloidogyne spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combinations showed positive synergism against Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. in laboratory tests.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combinationse0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp.e0
Direction
positive synergistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive synergistic effects of almost all four used combinations on Meloidogyne spp., Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combinations showed positive synergism against Abutilon theophrasti and Digitaria sanguinalis.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combinationse0
Interactor
Abutilon theophrastiAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Second interactor
Digitaria sanguinalisDigitaria sanguinalise0weed
Outcome
Abutilon theophrasti and Digitaria sanguinalise0
Direction
positive synergistice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Digitaria sanguinalis
Digitaria sanguinalis · Second interactorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive synergistic effects of almost all four used combinations on Meloidogyne spp., Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., Abutilon theophrasti and Digitaria sanguinalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced DMDS plus MNa suppressed Meloidogyne spp. with root galling indices of 2.1% and 11.7%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DMDS + MNa (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 )e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pest
Outcome
root galling indexe0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
2.1% and 11.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMDS + MNa (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 ), both at a 50% reduced dose, effectively suppressed Meloidogyne spp. with a low root galling index (2.1% and 11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced DMDS plus MNa significantly lowered Phytophthora and Fusarium levels, with root disease indices of 7.5% and 15.8%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
DMDS + MNat1
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorae0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Outcome
root disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.5% and 15.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced the levels of Phytophthora and Fusarium spp. with a low root disease index (7.5% and 15.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
t1

“Field trials found that DMDS + MNa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced DMDS plus MNa produced cucumber yields of 6.75 and 10.03 kg m −2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
DMDS + MNat1
Outcome
cucumber yieldse0
Direction
very highe0
Value
6.75 kg m −2 and 10.03 kg m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave very high cucumber yields (6.75 kg m −2 and 10.03 kg m −2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1182 · show in text ↑
t1

“Field trials found that DMDS + MNa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave the highest economic benefits, 20.91 and 23.58 ¥ m −2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
DMDS + MNat1
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.91 ¥ m −2 and 23.58 ¥ m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased income for cucumber growers with the highest economic benefits (20.91 ¥ m −2 and 23.58 ¥ m −2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1293 · show in text ↑
t1

“Field trials found that DMDS + MNa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination matched standard MB or DMDS treatments for pest control and yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combination treatmente0
Outcome
pest control and yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
MB standard dose treatment (40 g a. i. m −2 ) or DMDS standard dose treatment (60 g a. i. m −2 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination treatment provided similar results as MB standard dose treatment (40 g a. i. m −2 ) or DMDS standard dose treatment (60 g a. i. m −2 ) in pest control and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination outperformed standard MNa for pest control and yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combination treatmentt1
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
MNa standard dose treatment (42 g a. i. m −2 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was more effective than MNa standard dose treatment (42 g a. i. m −2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
t1

“combination treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All chemical treatments significantly outperformed the untreated control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all chemical treatmentse0
Outcome
better significant resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
untreated group of controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Usage of all chemical treatments gave better significant results than the untreated group of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the reduced DMDS plus MNa combination for cucumber soil fumigation in China.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
DMDS plus MNa combination (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 )e0
Outcome
could be used for soil fumigatione0
Setting
Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the DMDS plus MNa combination (30 + 21 g a. i. m −2 ) could be used for soil fumigation in cucumber production in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1805 · show in text ↑

dimethyl disulfide · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

dimethyl disulfide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.