Abstract
The effectiveness of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) to control root-knot nematodes ( Meloidogyne spp.) and weeds was tested for the first time in Hungary in two consecutive protected cucumber crops with application made only before the first crop. The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control. During the first cucumber cycle vigour-index, yield, root-gall index, Meloidogyne juveniles in the soil and germination of weeds were evaluated. All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6; (ii) cumulative yield/sample of 45.1 kg, 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kg; root-gall index (RGI) of 1.2, 4.9, and 5.9; (iii) M. incognita J2/25 g soil of 0.25, 48.5 and 78.0, and (iv) number of weed seedlings/sample in the 20–30 cm soil profile of 1.1, 2.6, and 4.2. During the second cucumber crop, only root-gall index was evaluated. Results showed that a single DMDS treatment applied before the first crop had a prolonged beneficial effect on the following crop. In the second crop cycle, root gall indices were 5.58, 9.18, and 8.44 for DMDS treated plots, chemical control and untreated control, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
DMDS improved cucumber vigour index to 7.0 versus 4.3 under fosthiazate and 3.6 untreated.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplinese1
- Outcome
- vigour-indexe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 7.0e0
- Qualifier
- 4.3 and 3.6e0
- Comparator
- Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6”
e1“The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
DMDS raised first-cycle cumulative cucumber yield to 45.1 kg per sample versus 30.9 and 16.6 kg.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplinese1
- Outcome
- cumulative yield/samplee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 45.1 kge0
- Qualifier
- 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kge0
- Comparator
- Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6; (ii) cumulative yield/sample of 45.1 kg, 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kg”
e1“The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
DMDS reduced first-cycle cucumber root gall index to 1.2 versus 4.9 and 5.9.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplinese1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne spp.
Meloidogynee2pathogen - Outcome
- root-gall index (RGI)e0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.2e0
- Qualifier
- 4.9, and 5.9e0
- Comparator
- Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6; (ii) cumulative yield/sample of 45.1 kg, 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kg; root-gall index (RGI) of 1.2, 4.9, and 5.9”
e1“The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
e2“root-knot nematodes ( Meloidogyne spp.)”
Claim · model-written summary
DMDS reduced soil M. incognita juveniles to 0.25 per 25 g versus 48.5 and 78.0.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplinese1
- Interactor
- M. incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- M. incognita J2/25 g soile0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 0.25e0
- Qualifier
- 48.5 and 78.0e0
- Comparator
- Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6; (ii) cumulative yield/sample of 45.1 kg, 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kg; root-gall index (RGI) of 1.2, 4.9, and 5.9; (iii) M. incognita J2/25 g soil of 0.25, 48.5 and 78.0”
e1“The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
DMDS reduced weed seedlings per sample to 1.1 versus 2.6 and 4.2.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplinese1
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- number of weed seedlings/samplee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.1e0
- Qualifier
- 2.6, and 4.2e0
- Comparator
- Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All considered parameters were significantly improved by using DMDS compared respectively to the chemical standard and untreated control: (i) vigour-index of 7.0, 4.3 and 3.6; (ii) cumulative yield/sample of 45.1 kg, 30.9 kg, and 16.6 kg; root-gall index (RGI) of 1.2, 4.9, and 5.9; (iii) M. incognita J2/25 g soil of 0.25, 48.5 and 78.0, and (iv) number of weed seedlings/sample in the 20–30 cm soil profile of 1.1, 2.6, and 4.2”
e1“The treatments were Accolade EC (DMDS 94.1%) at 400 l/ha applied by driplines, Nemathorin 10 G (fosthiazate) at 30 kg/ha, and an untreated control”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
Claim · model-written summary
One pre-crop DMDS application lowered second-cycle cucumber root gall index to 5.58 versus 9.18 and 8.44.
- Taxon
- Cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- a single DMDS treatment applied before the first crope0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne spp.
Meloidogynee1pathogen - Outcome
- root gall indicese0
- Direction
- beneficial effecte0
- Value
- 5.58e0
- Qualifier
- 9.18, and 8.44e0
- Comparator
- chemical control and untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“a single DMDS treatment applied before the first crop had a prolonged beneficial effect on the following crop. In the second crop cycle, root gall indices were 5.58, 9.18, and 8.44 for DMDS treated plots, chemical control and untreated control, respectively”
t0“Protected Cucumber”
e1“root-knot nematodes ( Meloidogyne spp.)”
The same questions in other papers
dimethyl disulfide · Meloidogyne · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
dimethyl disulfide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.