Paper · 2014 · Korean Journal of Agricultural Science

Change of photosynthetic efficiency and yield by low light intensity on ripening stage in japonica rice

Min Hee Lee; Shin-Gu Kang; Wan-Gyu Sang; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

최근 육성된 고품질 벼 품종인 보람찬, 호품 및 호농을 공시하여 질소 시비량(9, 18 kg/10a) 및 출수 직후 차광처리(50, 70%)에 의한 등숙기 일조부족이 광합성 특성 변화와 수량 및 수량구성형질 등에 미치는 영향을 검토한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 등숙기 차광처리에 의해 Fv/Fm 및 SPAD값은 차광률이 높을수록 그 감소율이 적었으며, 질소 시비량을 증가에 따른 유의적인 변화는 없었다. 다른 품종과 달리 호농의 경우 18 kg 처리시 자연광에서 자란 시료에서도 감소율이 완만하게 나타났다. 2. 등숙기 차광처리에 의해 천립중과 수량은 차광에 따라 감소하였고, 차광률에 따라 더 높은 감소율을 보였다. 천립중은 세 품종 중 보람찬이 가장 많이 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 차광 70% 처리시 질소 시비량의 증수에 따라서 감소율이 더 급격히 나타나 등숙기 일조부족에 질소질 비료의 추가시용은 비효율적임을 알 수 있었다. 3. 등숙기 차광처리시 백미 단백질 함량은 증가하였고 50% 차광 보다 70% 차광에서 높았으며, 호농이 보람찬과 호품에 비해 단백질 함량의 변화가 적었다. 4. 등숙기 차광처리시 아밀로스 함량 변화는 감소하는 경향을 보였으며, 호농이 보람찬과 호품에 비해 변화가 적었다. 5. 등숙기 차광처리에 따른 쌀의 품위 분석 결과 보람찬과 호품은 차광에 의해 완전립 비율이 차광율 70%일 때 64.8-70.9%로 크게 감소하였는데 이는 분상질립의 증가로 인한 것으로 판단된다. Light intensity is one of the most important requirements for plant growth, affecting growth, development, survival, and crop productivity. Sunlight is the main energy source on Earth which is energy used by photosynthesis to convert light energy to chemical energy. In this study, the light use efficiency and photosynthetic characteristics of high-quality rice cultivars were evaluated after shading on ripening stage. For the study, we treated of three levels of shade (0, 50 and 70%) on rice at ripening stage and two levels of nitrogen (9 and 18 kg/10a) used three high yielding rice cultivars, such as Boramchan, Hopum, and Honong. The shade was given for the respective plots from heading up to harvesting. We were performed to determine growth survey, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence every 10 days interval after shading on ripening stage. At harvest stage, grain yield and yield components were determined. Results of analysis of the results representing the maximum photosynthetic efficiency of PSII, Fv/Fm, and SPAD were decreased by depending on the time at full sunlight. But shade treatments were not changed and a significant difference among cultivars did not appear. Compared with the full sunlight, shade treatments significantly delayed ripening rate and decreased rice quality of cultivated rice. Therefore, rice yield, can be reduced in proportion to the shading density is apparent, the rate of decrease was not observed difference between varieties, when protected from light 70%, and decreased to less than 50%. The adverse effects of low light intensity on the yield and yield components were not able to significantly minimize by the nitrogen level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm and SPAD declined over time under full sunlight.

Outcome
Fv/Fm, and SPADe0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
full sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of analysis of the results representing the maximum photosynthetic efficiency of PSII, Fv/Fm, and SPAD were decreased by depending on the time at full sunlight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not change these photosynthetic indicators.

Treatment
shade treatmentse0
Outcome
shade treatments were not changede0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But shade treatments were not changed and a significant difference among cultivars did not appear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1919 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant cultivar difference appeared for the photosynthetic indicators.

Outcome
significant difference among cultivars did not appeare0
Direction
did not appeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But shade treatments were not changed and a significant difference among cultivars did not appear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1919 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading delayed ripening rate compared with full sunlight.

Treatment
shade treatmentse0
Outcome
ripening ratee0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
full sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the full sunlight, shade treatments significantly delayed ripening rate and decreased rice quality of cultivated rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2052 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased rice quality compared with full sunlight.

Treatment
shade treatmentse0
Outcome
rice qualitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
full sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the full sunlight, shade treatments significantly delayed ripening rate and decreased rice quality of cultivated rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2052 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield decreased as shading density increased.

Treatment
shading densitye0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, rice yield, can be reduced in proportion to the shading density is apparent, the rate of decrease was not observed difference between varieties, when protected from light 70%, and decreased to less than 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2271 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decrease did not differ among varieties.

Outcome
rate of decreasee0
Direction
not observed differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, rice yield, can be reduced in proportion to the shading density is apparent, the rate of decrease was not observed difference between varieties, when protected from light 70%, and decreased to less than 50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2271 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level did not significantly mitigate low light effects on yield and yield components.

Treatment
nitrogen levele0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
not able to significantly minimizee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adverse effects of low light intensity on the yield and yield components were not able to significantly minimize by the nitrogen level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2272–2411 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased white rice protein content, more at 70% than 50% shade.

Treatment
차광처리e0
Outcome
백미 단백질 함량e0
Direction
증가e0
Comparator
50% 차광e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“등숙기 차광처리시 백미 단백질 함량은 증가하였고 50% 차광 보다 70% 차광에서 높았으며, 호농이 보람찬과 호품에 비해 단백질 함량의 변화가 적었다.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading tended to decrease amylose content.

Treatment
차광처리e0
Outcome
아밀로스 함량e0
Direction
감소e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“등숙기 차광처리시 아밀로스 함량 변화는 감소하는 경향을 보였으며, 호농이 보람찬과 호품에 비해 변화가 적었다.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“japonica rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–103 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

shade · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.