Paper · 2016 · Agronomy Journal

Rough Rice and Milling Yields as Affected by Nitrogen, Harvest Moisture, and Cultivar

Christopher W. Rogers; Richard J. Norman; Terry J. Siebenmorgen; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improvements in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) production in the mid‐south United States have been made through advances in N management, harvest strategies, and cultivar selection. Efficient fertilizer‐N management is important for producing large yields. Harvest moisture content (HMC) affects grain quality [i.e., milled rice yield (MRY) and head rice yield (HRY)], as harvesting above or below optimum HMC results in decreased milling yields. Research was conducted from 2011 to 2013 investigating rough rice and milling yields as affected by fertilizer‐N application (0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 kg N ha −1 ), HMC (high, medium, and low), and cultivar (‘Cheniere’, ‘CLXL745’, and ‘Wells’). Maximum rough rice yields of 8916, 10,263, and 9353 kg ha −1 were calculated at N rates of 135, 149, and 146 kg N ha −1 for Cheniere, CLXL745, and Wells, respectively. At N rates to achieve maximum rough rice yield, MRY and HRY were 98 to 99.9% of the maximum milling yield within a cultivar‐HMC combination, excluding Wells harvested at low HMC. Within a cultivar–HMC combination, HRYs were <1 to 25% points greater at the maximum HRY–producing N rate than the minimum. Nitrogen rates needed to maximize rough rice yield and harvesting at high and medium HMC lead to near‐maximum HRYs; however, harvest at low N rates and HMC reduced HRY, particularly for CLXL745 and Wells. Further research focused on other hybrid and pure‐line rice cultivars will ensure that the current data are consistent for a wide range of cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cheniere maximum rough rice yield was 8916 kg ha −1 at 135 kg N ha −1.

Material
Chenieree0
Treatment
135, 149, and 146 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
rough rice yieldse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
8916, 10,263, and 9353 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rough rice yields of 8916, 10,263, and 9353 kg ha −1 were calculated at N rates of 135, 149, and 146 kg N ha −1 for Cheniere, CLXL745, and Wells, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At nitrogen rates for maximum rough yield, milling yields were 98 to 99.9% of cultivar and harvest moisture maxima, except Wells at low moisture.

Outcome
MRY and HRYe0
Value
98 to 99.9%e0
Qualifier
excluding Wells harvested at low HMCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At N rates to achieve maximum rough rice yield, MRY and HRY were 98 to 99.9% of the maximum milling yield within a cultivar‐HMC combination, excluding Wells harvested at low HMC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head rice yields were under 1 to 25 percentage points greater at the maximum rather than minimum head yield nitrogen rate.

Outcome
HRYse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
<1 to 25% pointse0
Comparator
the minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within a cultivar–HMC combination, HRYs were <1 to 25% points greater at the maximum HRY–producing N rate than the minimum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen rate and low harvest moisture reduced head rice yield, especially in CLXL745 and Wells.

Treatment
low N rates and HMCe0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
particularly for CLXL745 and Wellse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest at low N rates and HMC reduced HRY, particularly for CLXL745 and Wells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–10 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

soil water · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.