Paper · 1985 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Maize/oats forage rotation under 3 cultivation systems, 1978–83

C.W. Ross; K.A. Hughes

14
claims
32
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Soil conditions in the tillage zone (0– 300 mm) of a Tokomaru silt loam were monitored for 3 seasons of a long‐term continuous maize/oats forage cropping trial using different methods of crop establishment — plough/disc/harrow cultivation, minimum cultivation (disc/harrow), and non‐cultivation. Non‐cultivation resulted in higher soil bulk densities, larger structural units (aggregates), and lower porosities — particularly in the larger ‘aeration’ pore sizes (macropores) — compared to more conventional cultivation methods. Infiltration rates were significantly retarded by the non‐cultivation treatment but water retention in the plant‐available range was improved slightly. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Quicktests showed an accumulation of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in the uppermost soil layer (0–50 mm) on direct‐drilled plots, whereas the cultivated soil had a more homogeneous fertility status throughout the 0–300 mm zone. The soil physical and fertility conditions for minimum cultivation tended to be intermediate between non‐cultivation and conventional cultivation treatments. Soil aggregate stability, pH, organic carbon, and Quicktest calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) levels were not significantly affected by the method of tillage. Crop establishment and early plant growth were influenced by soil structural conditions in the seed zone. However, the effects of soil conditions resulting from the different tillage treatments on final crop yields were complicated by other factors. The continuous cropping regime used in this trial caused only a slight deterioration of soil structural conditions New Zealand Soil Bureau publication 970. Received 17 September 1984; revision 11 January 1985 compared to an adjacent grazed pasture. Topsoil pH and Mg showed declining trends and there was a significant drop in MAF Quicktest Ca levels in the uppermost 100 mm, with a simultaneous buildup of Ca below this depth. Fertiliser applications maintained or improved the levels of MAF Quicktest K and P. The results of these changes in soil conditions with continuous cropping on crop yields were inconclusive, but may be linked with the declining oat yields. Maize yields appeared to be more related to climatic and other factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cultivation raised soil density and aggregate size and lowered porosity.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
Non‐cultivatione0
Outcome
soil bulk densities, larger structural units (aggregates), and lower porositiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
more conventional cultivation methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non‐cultivation resulted in higher soil bulk densities, larger structural units (aggregates), and lower porosities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to more conventional cultivation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No cultivation significantly slowed infiltration.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
non‐cultivation treatmente0
Outcome
Infiltration ratese0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infiltration rates were significantly retarded by the non‐cultivation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cultivation slightly improved plant available water retention.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
non‐cultivation treatmente1
Outcome
water retention in the plant‐available rangee0
Direction
improved slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water retention in the plant‐available range was improved slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infiltration rates were significantly retarded by the non‐cultivation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct drilling accumulated P and K in surface soil.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
direct‐drilled plotse0
Outcome
phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in the uppermost soil layere0
Direction
accumulatione0
Comparator
cultivated soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an accumulation of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in the uppermost soil layer (0–50 mm) on direct‐drilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the cultivated soil had a more homogeneous fertility status throughout the 0–300 mm zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum cultivation had intermediate soil conditions.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
minimum cultivatione0
Outcome
soil physical and fertility conditionse0
Direction
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil physical and fertility conditions for minimum cultivation tended to be intermediate between non‐cultivation and conventional cultivation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect aggregate stability, pH, carbon, Ca or Mg.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
method of tillagee0
Outcome
Soil aggregate stability, pH, organic carbon, and Quicktest calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) levelse0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil aggregate stability, pH, organic carbon, and Quicktest calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) levels were not significantly affected by the method of tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed zone structure influenced establishment and early growth.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Outcome
Crop establishment and early plant growthe0
Setting
seed zonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop establishment and early plant growth were influenced by soil structural conditions in the seed zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous cropping slightly deteriorated soil structure versus pasture.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
continuous cropping regimee0
Outcome
soil structural conditionse0
Direction
slight deterioratione0
Comparator
adjacent grazed pasturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The continuous cropping regime used in this trial caused only a slight deterioration of soil structural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to an adjacent grazed pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsoil pH and Mg declined.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Outcome
Topsoil pH and Mge0
Direction
declining trendse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topsoil pH and Mg showed declining trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper 100 mm Ca decreased significantly.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Outcome
MAF Quicktest Ca levelse0
Direction
drope0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a significant drop in MAF Quicktest Ca levels in the uppermost 100 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca built up below 100 mm.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
buildupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a simultaneous buildup of Ca below this depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer maintained or improved K and P levels.

Taxon
Maize/oatsAvena sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
Fertiliser applicationse0
Outcome
levels of MAF Quicktest K and Pe0
Direction
maintained or improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertiliser applications maintained or improved the levels of MAF Quicktest K and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat yields may be linked to declining soil conditions.

Outcome
oat yieldse0
Direction
declininge0
Setting
soil conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“may be linked with the declining oat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize/oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of these changes in soil conditions with continuous cropping on crop yields were inconclusive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2140 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yields were more related to climate and other factors.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Maize yieldse0
Direction
more relatede0
Setting
climatic and other factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yields appeared to be more related to climatic and other factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2191–2261 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.