Paper · 1995 · Journal of Applied Ecology

Influence of Harvesting Intensity of Logging Residues on Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests

Bengt A. Olsson; Hakan Staaf

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
143
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ground-vegetation succession was analysed at four Swedish coniferous sites 8-16 years after clear-felling. At each site, three levels of logging-residue harvesting were applied in a randomized block design: above-stump whole-tree harvesting (no residues remaining); harvesting all tree parts except needles; and conventional harvest (residues left on site). Vegetational changes at each site were analysed by principal component analyses. Successional changes were related to the first principal components, whereas residue treatments were related to components of the second or lower order. Treatment-related differences in species cover, as analysed by a two-way ANOVA, were noted at all sites, 8 as well as 16 years after harvest. The covers of most vascular plant species, notably herbs and graminoids, were generally lower after whole-tree harvesting, while the covers of epigeic lichens and Vaccinium myrtillus were higher. Bryophytes were mostly indifferent to logging residue treatment, except for Pleurozium schreberi which had a lower cover in plots without logging residues. The overall differences were small and resembled those found along natural soil fertility gradients. The presence of woody debris appeared to have a weak, suppressive effect on the cover of the graminoids Deschampsia flexuosa and Luzula pilosa. This effect was only evident on the first study occasion, about 8 years after felling. Our results suggest that the major influence of logging residues left on site was related to their nutrient contribution. The impact tended to decrease over time and, in a long-term perspective it is suggested that treatment differences in species cover will be small, especially in forests developing dense canopies. However, one cannot exclude the possibility that repeated whole-tree harvesting will produce more drastic effects by reducing soil nutrient availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successional changes in ground vegetation were related to the first principal components.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
Successional changese1
Qualifier
first principal componentse1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Successional changes were related to the first principal components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue treatments were related to principal components of the second or lower order.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
residue treatmentse2
Qualifier
components of the second or lower ordere2

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas residue treatments were related to components of the second or lower order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting generally lowered the cover of most vascular plant species, notably herbs and graminoids.

Taxon
vascular plant speciese3
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge3
Outcome
coverse3
Direction
lowere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“The covers of most vascular plant species, notably herbs and graminoids, were generally lower after whole-tree harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting raised the cover of epigeic lichens.

Taxon
epigeic lichense4
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge4
Outcome
coverse4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“generally lower after whole-tree harvesting, while the covers of epigeic lichens and Vaccinium myrtillus were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-tree harvesting raised the cover of Vaccinium myrtillus.

Taxon
Vaccinium myrtillusVaccinium myrtilluse4
Treatment
whole-tree harvestinge4
Outcome
coverse4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium myrtillus
Vaccinium myrtillus · TaxonBenjamin Zwittnig · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e4

“generally lower after whole-tree harvesting, while the covers of epigeic lichens and Vaccinium myrtillus were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bryophytes were mostly indifferent to logging residue treatment in cover.

Taxon
Bryophytese5
Treatment
logging residue treatmente5
Outcome
covere5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bryophytes were mostly indifferent to logging residue treatment, except for Pleurozium schreberi which had a lower cover in plots without logging residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pleurozium schreberi had a lower cover in plots without logging residues.

Taxon
Pleurozium schreberiPleurozium schreberie5
Treatment
plots without logging residuese5
Outcome
covere5
Direction
lowere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pleurozium schreberi
Pleurozium schreberi · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Dickbauch~commonswiki assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bryophytes were mostly indifferent to logging residue treatment, except for Pleurozium schreberi which had a lower cover in plots without logging residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall differences in ground vegetation between treatments were small, resembling natural soil fertility gradients.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
overall differencese6
Qualifier
small and resembled those found along natural soil fertility gradientse6

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e6

“The overall differences were small and resembled those found along natural soil fertility gradients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Woody debris weakly suppressed the cover of Deschampsia flexuosa, only on the first study occasion.

Taxon
Deschampsia flexuosaAvenella flexuosae7
Treatment
presence of woody debrise7
Outcome
covere7
Direction
suppressivee7
Qualifier
only evident on the first study occasione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avenella flexuosa
Avenella flexuosa · TaxonBotaurus · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e7

“The presence of woody debris appeared to have a weak, suppressive effect on the cover of the graminoids Deschampsia flexuosa and Luzula pilosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1329 · show in text ↑
e2

“This effect was only evident on the first study occasion, about 8 years after felling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Woody debris weakly suppressed the cover of Luzula pilosa, only on the first study occasion.

Taxon
Luzula pilosaLuzula pilosae7
Treatment
presence of woody debrise7
Outcome
covere7
Direction
suppressivee7
Qualifier
only evident on the first study occasione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Luzula pilosa
Luzula pilosa · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e7

“The presence of woody debris appeared to have a weak, suppressive effect on the cover of the graminoids Deschampsia flexuosa and Luzula pilosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1329 · show in text ↑
e2

“This effect was only evident on the first study occasion, about 8 years after felling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1416 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The major influence of logging residues left on site on ground vegetation is suggested to relate to their nutrient contribution.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Treatment
logging residues left on sitee1
Outcome
major influence of logging residuese1
Qualifier
nutrient contributione1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Our results suggest that the major influence of logging residues left on site was related to their nutrient contribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The impact of residue treatment tended to decrease over time.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
impacte1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
over timee1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“The impact tended to decrease over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1579 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term treatment differences in species cover are suggested to be small, especially in forests developing dense canopies.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
treatment differences in species covere1
Qualifier
small, especially in forests developing dense canopiese1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“in a long-term perspective it is suggested that treatment differences in species cover will be small, especially in forests developing dense canopies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1734 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated whole-tree harvesting may produce more drastic vegetation effects by reducing soil nutrient availability, which cannot be excluded.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Treatment
repeated whole-tree harvestinge1
Outcome
more drastic effectse1
Qualifier
reducing soil nutrient availabilitye1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“one cannot exclude the possibility that repeated whole-tree harvesting will produce more drastic effects by reducing soil nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment-related differences in species cover were noted at all sites, 8 and 16 years after harvest.

Taxon
Ground Vegetationt0
Outcome
Treatment-related differences in species covere1
Qualifier
at all sites, 8 as well as 16 years after harveste1

Verbatim

t0

“Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment-related differences in species cover, as analysed by a two-way ANOVA, were noted at all sites, 8 as well as 16 years after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–732 · show in text ↑