Abstract
The effects of Pratylenchus vulnus on growth and nutrition of Cadaman peach and Ishtara and Julior plum rootstocks were evaluated in a microplot experiment lasting two growing seasons. Cadaman peach was the only rootstock that showed suppressed growth for all growth parameters at the end of the first year. At the end of the second growing season, dry and fresh shoot weights as well as shoot length and root weights of Cadaman peach were reduced in nematode-inoculated microplots in comparison to uninoculated treatments. Stem diameter was not affected. Dry and fresh shoot weights were the only growth parameters affected by the nematode in Ishtara plum at the end of the second growing season, whereas Julior was not affected by P. vulnus infection. No nutrient deficiencies were detected by foliar analysis in any of the rootstocks and treatments. All the tested rootstocks were good hosts for P. vulnus, whose mean root population ranged from 1,670 (Cadaman) to 2,895 (Julior) nematodes/g of root.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus vulnus reduced dry and fresh shoot weights of Cadaman peach.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- Cadamane0
- Organ / stage
- shoote1
- Treatment
- nematode-inoculatede1
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- dry and fresh shoot weightse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- uninoculated treatmentse1
- Setting
- microplotse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of Pratylenchus vulnus on growth and nutrition of Cadaman peach and Ishtara and Julior plum rootstocks were evaluated in a microplot experiment lasting two growing seasons”
e1“At the end of the second growing season, dry and fresh shoot weights as well as shoot length and root weights of Cadaman peach were reduced in nematode-inoculated microplots in comparison to uninoculated treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus vulnus reduced shoot length and root weights of Cadaman peach.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- Cadamane0
- Organ / stage
- roote1
- Treatment
- nematode-inoculatede1
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- shoot length and root weightse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- uninoculated treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of Pratylenchus vulnus on growth and nutrition of Cadaman peach and Ishtara and Julior plum rootstocks were evaluated in a microplot experiment lasting two growing seasons”
e1“At the end of the second growing season, dry and fresh shoot weights as well as shoot length and root weights of Cadaman peach were reduced in nematode-inoculated microplots in comparison to uninoculated treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Stem diameter was not affected in the peach and plum rootstocks.
Verbatim
t0“Growth Response of Peach and Plum Rootstocks”
e3“Stem diameter was not affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry and fresh shoot weights were the only growth parameters affected by Pratylenchus vulnus in Ishtara plum.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticae0 - Material
- Ishtarae0
- Organ / stage
- shoote4
- Treatment
- the nematodee4
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- Dry and fresh shoot weightse4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of Pratylenchus vulnus on growth and nutrition of Cadaman peach and Ishtara and Julior plum rootstocks were evaluated in a microplot experiment lasting two growing seasons”
e4“Dry and fresh shoot weights were the only growth parameters affected by the nematode in Ishtara plum at the end of the second growing season”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus vulnus infection did not affect growth of Julior plum.
- Taxon
- plum
Prunus domesticae0 - Material
- Juliore5
- Treatment
- P. vulnus infectione5
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogen
- Outcome
- growth parameterse4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of Pratylenchus vulnus on growth and nutrition of Cadaman peach and Ishtara and Julior plum rootstocks were evaluated in a microplot experiment lasting two growing seasons”
e4“Dry and fresh shoot weights were the only growth parameters affected by the nematode in Ishtara plum at the end of the second growing season”
e5“whereas Julior was not affected by P. vulnus infection”
Claim · model-written summary
No nutrient deficiencies were detected by foliar analysis in any of the rootstocks and treatments.
Verbatim
t0“Growth Response of Peach and Plum Rootstocks”
e6“No nutrient deficiencies were detected by foliar analysis in any of the rootstocks and treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested rootstocks were good hosts for Pratylenchus vulnus.
- Taxon
- Peach and Plum Rootstockst0
- Interactor
- P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse7pathogen
- Outcome
- good hostse7
Verbatim
t0“Growth Response of Peach and Plum Rootstocks”
e7“All the tested rootstocks were good hosts for P. vulnus, whose mean root population ranged from 1,670 (Cadaman) to 2,895 (Julior) nematodes/g of root”
Claim · model-written summary
Mean root population of Pratylenchus vulnus ranged from 1,670 nematodes/g of root in Cadaman to 2,895 in Julior.
Verbatim
t0“Growth Response of Peach and Plum Rootstocks”
e7“All the tested rootstocks were good hosts for P. vulnus, whose mean root population ranged from 1,670 (Cadaman) to 2,895 (Julior) nematodes/g of root”
The same questions in other papers
infection · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.