Paper · 2016 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Soil properties and corn (Zea mays L.) production under manure application combined with deep tillage management in solonetzic soils of Songnen Plain, Northeast China

Qing-feng MENG; Da-wei LI; Juan ZHANG; et al.

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Poor soil structure and nutrients, excessive exchangeable Na+, high pH as well as low enzyme activities are common in the solonetz, and significantly restrict corn (Zea mays L.) production. Cattle manure application combined with deep tillage is an important management practice that can affect soil physico-chemical properties and enzyme activities as well as corn yield in the solonetz. Field experiments were carried out in a randomized complete block design comprising four treatments: Corn with conventional tillage was used as a control, and corn with manure application combined with deep tillage as well as film mulching and aluminium sulfate were used as the experimental treatments, respectively. The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties was determined using stepwise regression analysis. Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties in the solonetz. The highest corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching (11 472 and 12 228 kg ha−1), and increased by 38 and 43% comparing with the control treatment (8 343 and 8 552 kg ha−1) both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments, respectively. Using factor analysis, three factors were obtained, which represented soil fertility status, soil saline-alkaline properties and soil structural properties both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments, respectively. Manure and deep tillage management resulted in two distinct groups of soil properties: (1) soils with manure application combined with deep tillage and (2) soils with conventional tillage. Stepwise regression analysis showed that corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P, as well as negatively correlated to pH, electrical conductivity (EC), exchange sodium percentage (ESP), and bulk density (ρb). We concluded that ρb was dominant factor for corn yield on the basis of discriminant coefficient. Manure application combined with deep tillage management resulted in an increase in corn yield mainly owing to improved soil structural properties, followed by decreased soil saline-alkaline obstacle as well as increased urease activity and available P. This result is likely that the improvement in soil organic matter (SOM) from manure application greatly and positively contributed to better soil physico-chemical properties and enzyme activities, especially decrease in ρb. Suggestion for corn production should be improvement in soil structural properties firstly. This could cause decrease in ρb that key factor which limited the corn production in the solonetz.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus deep tillage increased corn yield relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
Manure application combined with deep tillage managemente0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus deep tillage improved soil properties relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
Manure application combined with deep tillage managemente0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure, deep tillage and plastic film produced 11 472 kg ha−1 corn yield in 2013, 38% above control.

Treatment
manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11 472e0
Qualifier
2013e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching (11 472 and 12 228 kg ha−1), and increased by 38 and 43% comparing with the control treatment (8 343 and 8 552 kg ha−1) both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure, deep tillage and plastic film produced 12 228 kg ha−1 corn yield in 2014, 43% above control.

Treatment
manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12 228 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2014e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching (11 472 and 12 228 kg ha−1), and increased by 38 and 43% comparing with the control treatment (8 343 and 8 552 kg ha−1) both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Factor analysis identified soil fertility, saline-alkaline and structural factors in both years.

Outcome
three factors were obtainede1
Value
threee1
Qualifier
2013 and 2014 experimentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“three factors were obtained, which represented soil fertility status, soil saline-alkaline properties and soil structural properties both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and deep tillage distinguished treated from conventionally tilled soil properties.

Outcome
two distinct groups of soil propertiese1
Value
twoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“Manure and deep tillage management resulted in two distinct groups of soil properties: (1) soils with manure application combined with deep tillage and (2) soils with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1684 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield correlated positively with urease and available P.

Compound
available Pe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1807 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield correlated negatively with pH, EC, ESP and bulk density.

Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
negativelye0
Setting
pH, electrical conductivity (EC), exchange sodium percentage (ESP), and bulk density (ρb)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P, as well as negatively correlated to pH, electrical conductivity (EC), exchange sodium percentage (ESP), and bulk density (ρb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1934 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density was the dominant yield factor by discriminant coefficient.

Outcome
dominant factor for corn yielde1
Setting
ρbe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“ρb was dominant factor for corn yield on the basis of discriminant coefficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2032 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute yield gains mainly to improved soil structure, then reduced salinity and increased urease and available P.

Compound
available Pe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Qualifier
improved soil structural propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield mainly owing to improved soil structural properties, followed by decreased soil saline-alkaline obstacle as well as increased urease activity and available P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2286 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors link manure-derived organic matter to better soil properties, especially lower bulk density.

Treatment
manure applicatione1
Outcome
better soil physico-chemical properties and enzyme activitiese1
Direction
decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“improvement in soil organic matter (SOM) from manure application greatly and positively contributed to better soil physico-chemical properties and enzyme activities, especially decrease in ρb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2510 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend first improving soil structure for corn production.

Outcome
improvement in soil structural properties firstlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Suggestion for corn production should be improvement in soil structural properties firstly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2512–2602 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

    Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1 · 1973 · compared with conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment

    Opposite direction

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.