Paper · 2004

POTENTIAL GROWTH AND BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY OF KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.) UNDER CENTRAL GREEK CONDITIONS: II. THE INFLUENCE OF VARIETY, SOWING TIME AND PLANT DENSITY

N.G. Danalatos; Sotirios V. Archontoulis

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The adaptability, growth and productivity of the kenaf varieties Tainnung 2 and Everglades 41 were studied under two different sowing dates and two plant populations in a field experiment carried out under constraint free conditions in central Greece in 2003. Plant height, LAI and biomass production were measured in subsequent harvests throughout the growing period. It was found that both varieties performed similar growth, whereas growth and biomass yields were almost identical for the two different plant populations. On the contrary, significant differences were found with respect to the two different sowing times. The early plantings performed significantly (P≤ 0.05) greater growth trates (plant height, LAI, dry matter yield) throughout the growing period, reaching a maximum dry biomass yield of 22.74 t ha -1 by mid-October (17.35 t ha -1 dry stem), whereas the late crops did not exceed 16.08 t ha -1 (11.58 t ha -1 dry stem) by November. Considering that in both cases, similar growth rates were recorded during the growing period (maximum values about 240 kg ha -1 d -1 ), the

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two kenaf varieties had similar growth.

Outcome
growthe0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both varieties performed similar growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two plant populations had almost identical growth and biomass yields.

Treatment
two different plant populationse0
Outcome
growth and biomass yieldse0
Direction
almost identicale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and biomass yields were almost identical for the two different plant populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing produced significantly greater height and LAI growth throughout the growing period than late sowing.

Treatment
early plantingse0
Outcome
plant height, LAIe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
throughout the growing periode0
Comparator
late cropse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The early plantings performed significantly (P≤ 0.05) greater growth trates (plant height, LAI, dry matter yield) throughout the growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the late crops did not exceed 16.08 t ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting reached a maximum dry biomass yield of 22.74 t ha -1 by mid-October, versus no more than 16.08 t ha -1 for late crops by November.

Treatment
early plantingse1
Outcome
dry biomass yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
22.74 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
16.08 t ha -1e0
Comparator
late cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reaching a maximum dry biomass yield of 22.74 t ha -1 by mid-October (17.35 t ha -1 dry stem), whereas the late crops did not exceed 16.08 t ha -1 (11.58 t ha -1 dry stem) by November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“The early plantings performed significantly (P≤ 0.05) greater growth trates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting yielded 17.35 t ha -1 dry stem, versus 11.58 t ha -1 with late planting.

Treatment
early plantingse1
Outcome
dry steme0
Direction
greatere1
Value
17.35 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
11.58 t ha -1e0
Comparator
late cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(17.35 t ha -1 dry stem), whereas the late crops did not exceed 16.08 t ha -1 (11.58 t ha -1 dry stem)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“The early plantings performed significantly (P≤ 0.05) greater growth trates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two sowing dates had similar growth rates during the growing period, peaking at about 240 kg ha -1 d -1.

Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
similare0
Value
about 240 kg ha -1 d -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in both cases, similar growth rates were recorded during the growing period (maximum values about 240 kg ha -1 d -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“KENAF (HIBISCUS CANNABINUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · yield · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.