Paper · 2014 · Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering

An Assessment of Rain Water Supply for Kenaf- Maize Intercrop

Abayomi Eruola Julius Awomeso

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Understanding the advantage of crop water use in mixed crops over sole cropping is vital in developing optimum water management crop production in the tropical wet-and-dry climate. This study investigated water supply potential for the cultivation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) – maize (Zea mays L.) intercrop in of South-western Nigeria. The phenological stages of each of the crops formed the basis for the investigation. The experiment comprises of two varieties of kenaf (Tainung 1 and Ifeken400), one variety of maize (DMR-LSR-Y) and two planting season (early and late). Selected moisture indices were measured daily and processed into ten-day (dekad) average for the 2007 and 2008 cropping seasons following FAO. Descriptive statistics was employed for the analysis. Relating the effective water availability to the indices of moisture adequacy for the growth of the crop in sole and intercrop, it was found that the agro-climatic moisture indices were optimum during the moisture sensitive stages particularly for early season planting irrespective of cropping pattern. A comparison of maize and kenaf production in sole or intercrop in the study area showed that early planting promotes the growth, development and yield irrespective of planting season. Mono-cropping maize and kenaf performed better than intercropping. However, water supply in rain-fed agriculture was confirmed to be efficient for maize/ kenaf intercrop in South-western Nigeria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting promoted the growth, development and yield of maize and kenaf irrespective of planting season.

Taxon
maize and kenafZea maysHibiscus cannabinuse0
Treatment
early plantinge0
Outcome
growth, development and yielde0
Direction
promotese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kenaf- Maize Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“A comparison of maize and kenaf production in sole or intercrop in the study area showed that early planting promotes the growth, development and yield irrespective of planting season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize and kenaf performed better as mono-crops than as an intercrop.

Taxon
maize and kenafZea maysHibiscus cannabinuse1
Treatment
Mono-croppinge1
Direction
performed bettere1
Comparator
intercroppinge1

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kenaf- Maize Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mono-cropping maize and kenaf performed better than intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water supply in rain-fed agriculture was efficient for maize/kenaf intercrop in South-western Nigeria.

Outcome
water supplye2
Qualifier
efficiente2
Setting
South-western Nigeriae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kenaf- Maize Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“water supply in rain-fed agriculture was confirmed to be efficient for maize/ kenaf intercrop in South-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1461 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agro-climatic moisture indices were optimum during the moisture-sensitive stages, particularly for early season planting, irrespective of cropping pattern.

Organ / stage
moisture sensitive stagese3
Treatment
early season plantinge3
Outcome
agro-climatic moisture indicese3
Direction
optimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kenaf- Maize Intercrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“the agro-climatic moisture indices were optimum during the moisture sensitive stages particularly for early season planting irrespective of cropping pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1080 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.