Paper · 2014 · The Professional Animal Scientist

Comparison of alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, and cicer milkvetch in combination with 25, 50, or 75% tall fescue in a continuous-culture system

C.T. Noviandi; K. Neal; J.-S. Eun; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A continuous-culture experiment was performed to investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios (TF:legume = 75:25, 50:50, or 25:75 on a DM basis) of 3 different TF-legume mixed diets [TF-alfalfa (TF+AF), TF-birdsfoot trefoil (TF+BT), or TF-cicer milkvetch (TF+CM)] on in vitro fermentation characteristics. Nine dietary treatments were tested in a 3 (TF-legume ratio) × 3 (TF-legume mixed diet) split-plot design. Dietary treatments did not affect the concentrations of total VFA, acetate, and butyrate, whereas increasing legume proportion increased propionate concentration (P = 0.03). Regardless of TF-legume ratio, feeding TF+CM re sulted in the greatest propionate concentration, whereas TF+AF and TF+BT maintained a similar concentration of propionate. The TF+AF combination resulted in a greater acetate-to-propionate ratio than TF+BT or TF+CM (P = 0.03). Decrease in ammonia-N concentration (P < 0.01) was noticed when legume proportion decreased. Ammonia-N concentration of TF+CM decreased (P < 0.01) compared with TF+AF, and it further decreased in cultures receiving TF+BT (P < 0.01). Methane production was decreased by increasing legume proportions, and the result was particularly notable in TF+BT due to increased condensed tannin concentration. In addition, TF+BT increased the proportion of C18:1 trans-11 and decreased C18:0 in the culture (P < 0.01), but no effects were detected because of legume ratio. Results of this experiment indicate that increasing the proportion of legume in combination with TF favorably shifted in vitro fermentation pathways by producing more propionate and less ammonia-N and methane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dietary treatments did not affect total VFA, acetate or butyrate concentrations in vitro.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Dietary treatmentse2
Outcome
total VFA, acetate, and butyratee2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dietary treatments did not affect the concentrations of total VFA, acetate, and butyrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing legume proportion increased propionate concentration.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
increasing legume proportione3
Outcome
propionate concentratione3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e3

“increasing legume proportion increased propionate concentration (P = 0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding TF+CM gave the greatest propionate concentration regardless of TF-legume ratio.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
feeding TF+CMe4
Outcome
propionate concentratione4
Direction
greateste4
Qualifier
Regardless of TF-legume ratioe4
Comparator
TF+AF and TF+BTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regardless of TF-legume ratio, feeding TF+CM re sulted in the greatest propionate concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–698 · show in text ↑
e5

“TF+AF and TF+BT maintained a similar concentration of propionate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TF+AF and TF+BT maintained a similar propionate concentration.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+AFe5
Outcome
concentration of propionatee5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
TF+BTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e5

“TF+AF and TF+BT maintained a similar concentration of propionate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TF+AF gave a greater acetate-to-propionate ratio than TF+BT or TF+CM.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+AF combinatione6
Outcome
acetate-to-propionate ratioe6
Direction
greatere6
Comparator
TF+BT or TF+CMe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“The TF+AF combination resulted in a greater acetate-to-propionate ratio than TF+BT or TF+CM (P = 0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia-N concentration decreased when legume proportion decreased.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
legume proportion decreasede7
Outcome
ammonia-N concentratione7
Direction
Decreasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“Decrease in ammonia-N concentration (P < 0.01) was noticed when legume proportion decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia-N concentration was lower in TF+CM than in TF+AF.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+CMe6
Outcome
Ammonia-N concentratione6
Direction
decreasede6
Comparator
TF+AFe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ammonia-N concentration of TF+CM decreased (P < 0.01) compared with TF+AF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia-N concentration was further lower in TF+BT than in TF+CM.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+BTe6
Outcome
Ammonia-N concentratione6
Direction
further decreasede6
Comparator
TF+CMe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ammonia-N concentration of TF+CM decreased (P < 0.01) compared with TF+AF, and it further decreased in cultures receiving TF+BT (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methane production decreased with increasing legume proportions.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
increasing legume proportionse4
Outcome
Methane productione4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“TF-cicer milkvetch (TF+CM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–278 · show in text ↑
e4

“Methane production was decreased by increasing legume proportions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1176 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The methane decrease was particularly notable in TF+BT, which the authors attribute to increased condensed tannin concentration.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Compound
condensed tannine4
Outcome
Methane productione4
Qualifier
particularly notable in TF+BTe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e4

“Methane production was decreased by increasing legume proportions, and the result was particularly notable in TF+BT due to increased condensed tannin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TF+BT increased the proportion of C18:1 trans-11 in the culture.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+BTe7
Outcome
proportion of C18:1 trans-11e7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“In addition, TF+BT increased the proportion of C18:1 trans-11 and decreased C18:0 in the culture (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TF+BT decreased C18:0 in the culture.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
TF+BTe7
Outcome
C18:0e7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“In addition, TF+BT increased the proportion of C18:1 trans-11 and decreased C18:0 in the culture (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume ratio had no detectable effect on C18 fatty acid changes in the culture.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
legume ratioe7
Outcome
C18:0e7
Direction
no effectse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of tall fescue (TF)-to-legume ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“In addition, TF+BT increased the proportion of C18:1 trans-11 and decreased C18:0 in the culture (P < 0.01), but no effects were detected because of legume ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1437 · show in text ↑

infection · molecular: metabolites · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.