Paper · 1993 · HortScience

734 (PS 7) FRUIT GROWTH RESPONSES IN `HEDELFINGEN' SWEET CHERRY WITH FIVE ROOTSTOCK CULTIVARS, BLOSSOM THINNING, AND IRRIGATION

Cheol Choi; R. L. Andersen; T. L. Robinson

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Small fruit size reduces fresh-market value and potential net income in sweet cherry. Several new rootstock cultivars for sweet cherry induce greater precocity, heavier blossom density, and a range of dwarfing but also may reduce fruit size. A field study was undertaken with sixth leaf `Hedelfingen' scions grown on Prunus avium L. `Mazzard' seedling rootstock or on one of 4 new rootstock cultivars: `Damil,' `Gi 148/1,' `Gi 172/9,' and `Gi 196/4.' Factorial treatments included (+/-) trickle irrigation when soil tensiometer readings reached 20 k Pa and (+/-) hand thinning to single fruits/cluster aat 7 days after full bloom. High natural precipitation reduced irrigation effect but fruit size was increased significantly by thinning. Yield differences were also seen between rootstock cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural precipitation reduced the irrigation effect on sweet cherry fruit size.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
irrigation effecte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
High natural precipitatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High natural precipitation reduced irrigation effect but fruit size was increased significantly by thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning significantly increased sweet cherry fruit size.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit size was increased significantly by thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet cherry yield differed among rootstock cultivars.

Taxon
SWEET CHERRYPrunus aviumt0
Material
rootstock cultivarse0
Outcome
Yield differencese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield differences were also seen between rootstock cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET CHERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.