Paper · 2010 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

Effect of autumn management on winter annual weeds prior to cotton planting.

Theodore M. Webster

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of autumn tillage and herbicide applications on the control of cutleaf evening-primrose prior to planting cotton. In one study, different timings and combinations of autumn disking and glyphosate applications were evaluated following harvest of the preceding cotton or corn crop. Treatments implemented following corn harvest were inconsistent for annual winter weed control. Relative to the nontreated control, treatments that included disking or glyphosate at 5 wk after harvest (WAH) of cotton had lower cutleaf evening-primrose ground cover estimates and plant population densities, with the exception of glyphosate applied at 5 WAH in 2004. Critical establishment of cutleaf evening-primrose occurred in these studies around 5 wk after cotton harvest (first week of November), whereas post-corn harvest treatments were applied prior to cutleaf evening-primrose establishment. In the second study, pre-plant applications of 2,4-D in three tillage systems were evaluated for cutleaf evening-primrose growth. Application of 2,4-D effectively controlled cutleaf evening-primrose, leaving no green plants at the time of cotton planting. There were differences in the number of cutleaf evening-primrose remnant plants among both tillage and 2,4-D systems. Conventional tillage had fewer cutleaf evening-primrose plants than reduced tillages. Application of 2,4-D to both strip-tillage and no-tillage reduced cutleaf evening-primrose plant density by 70% or greater. Although there was no effect of tillage system on cotton yield, preplant applications of 2,4-D increased cotton growth and yield relative to nontreated controls. 2,4-D was an effective option for cutleaf evening-primrose control prior to cotton planting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-corn-harvest treatments gave inconsistent winter weed control.

Treatment
Treatments implemented following corn harveste0
Outcome
annual winter weed controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments implemented following corn harvest were inconsistent for annual winter weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disking or glyphosate at five weeks after cotton harvest reduced cutleaf evening-primrose ground cover and density, except glyphosate in 2004.

Treatment
disking or glyphosate at 5 wk after harvest (WAH) of cottone0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrose ground cover estimates and plant population densitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
with the exception of glyphosate applied at 5 WAH in 2004e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the nontreated control, treatments that included disking or glyphosate at 5 wk after harvest (WAH) of cotton had lower cutleaf evening-primrose ground cover estimates and plant population densities, with the exception of glyphosate applied at 5 WAH in 2004.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical cutleaf evening-primrose establishment occurred around five weeks after cotton harvest.

Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
Critical establishment of cutleaf evening-primrosee0
Value
5 wke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Critical establishment of cutleaf evening-primrose occurred in these studies around 5 wk after cotton harvest (first week of November)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant 2,4-D controlled cutleaf evening-primrose, leaving no green plants at cotton planting.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrosee0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D effectively controlled cutleaf evening-primrose, leaving no green plants at the time of cotton planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1190 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutleaf evening-primrose remnant numbers differed among tillage and 2,4-D systems.

Treatment
tillage and 2,4-D systemse0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
number of cutleaf evening-primrose remnant plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences in the number of cutleaf evening-primrose remnant plants among both tillage and 2,4-D systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had fewer cutleaf evening-primrose plants than reduced tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrose plantse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
reduced tillagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage had fewer cutleaf evening-primrose plants than reduced tillages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D in strip-tillage reduced cutleaf evening-primrose density by at least 70%.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrose plant densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70% or greatere0
Qualifier
strip-tillagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D to both strip-tillage and no-tillage reduced cutleaf evening-primrose plant density by 70% or greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D in no-tillage reduced cutleaf evening-primrose density by at least 70%.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrose plant densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70% or greatere0
Qualifier
no-tillagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D to both strip-tillage and no-tillage reduced cutleaf evening-primrose plant density by 70% or greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage system showed no effect on cotton yield.

Treatment
tillage systeme0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no effect of tillage system on cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant 2,4-D increased cotton growth and yield relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
preplant applications of 2,4-De0
Outcome
cotton growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nontreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preplant applications of 2,4-D increased cotton growth and yield relative to nontreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1680 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 2,4-D as an effective option for cutleaf evening-primrose control before cotton planting.

Interactor
cutleaf evening-primrosee0weed
Outcome
cutleaf evening-primrose control prior to cotton plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D was an effective option for cutleaf evening-primrose control prior to cotton planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1773 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

glyphosate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 113 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 113 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.