Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Effects of Tomato Root Exudates on Meloidogyne incognita

Guodong Yang; Baoli Zhou; Xinyu Zhang; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
98
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant root exudates affect root-knot nematodes egg hatch. Chemicals in root exudates can attract nematodes to the roots or result in repellence, motility inhibition or even death. However, until recently little was known about the relationship between tomato root exudates chemicals and root-knot nematodes. In this study, root exudates were extracted from three tomato rootstocks with varying levels of nematode resistance: Baliya (highly resistant, HR), RS2 (moderately resistant, MR) and L-402 (highly susceptible, T). The effects of the root exudates on Meloidogyne incognita (M. incognita) egg hatch, survival and chemotaxis of second-stage juveniles (J2) were explored. The composition of the root exudates was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) prior to and following M. incognita inoculation. Four compounds in root exudates were selected for further analysis and their allopathic effect on M. incognita were investigated. Root exudates from each tomato rootstocks (HR, MR and T strains) suppressed M. incognita egg hatch and increased J2 mortality, with the highest rate being observed in the exudates from the HR plants. Exudate from HR variety also repelled M. incognita J2 while that of the susceptible plant, T, was demonstrated to be attractive. The relative amount of esters and phenol compounds in root exudates from HR and MR tomato rootstocks increased notably after inoculation. Four compounds, 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate, dibutyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalate increased significantly after inoculation. The egg hatch of M. incognita was suppressed by each of the compound. L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate showed the most notable effect in a concentration-dependent manner. All four compounds were associated with increased J2 mortality. The greatest effect was observed with dimethyl phthalate at 2 mmol·L-1. Dibutyl phthalate was the only compound observed to repel M. incognita J2 with no effect being detected in the other compounds. Each of the four compounds were correlated with a reduction in disease index in the susceptible cultivar, T, and tomato seedlings irrigated with L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate at 2 mmol·L-1 showed the best resistance to M. incognita. Taken together, this study provided a valuable contribution to understanding the underlying mechanism of nematode resistance in tomato cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exudates from all three tomato rootstocks suppressed nematode egg hatch, strongest for HR.

Treatment
Root exudates from each tomato rootstocks (HR, MR and T strains)e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita egg hatche0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root exudates from each tomato rootstocks (HR, MR and T strains) suppressed M. incognita egg hatch and increased J2 mortality, with the highest rate being observed in the exudates from the HR plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exudates from all three rootstocks increased J2 mortality, strongest for HR.

Treatment
Root exudates from each tomato rootstocks (HR, MR and T strains)e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
J2 mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root exudates from each tomato rootstocks (HR, MR and T strains) suppressed M. incognita egg hatch and increased J2 mortality, with the highest rate being observed in the exudates from the HR plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HR exudate repelled M. incognita juveniles.

Treatment
Exudate from HR varietye0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita J2e0
Direction
repellede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exudate from HR variety also repelled M. incognita J2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible T exudate attracted M. incognita juveniles.

Treatment
susceptible plant, Te0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
Meloidogyne incognitat0
Direction
attractivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of the susceptible plant, T, was demonstrated to be attractive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esters and phenol compounds in HR and MR tomato exudates increased after inoculation.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
relative amount of esters and phenol compoundse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative amount of esters and phenol compounds in root exudates from HR and MR tomato rootstocks increased notably after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four named exudate compounds increased significantly after inoculation.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate, dibutyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalatee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four compounds, 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate, dibutyl phthalate and dimethyl phthalate increased significantly after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each of four exudate compounds suppressed M. incognita egg hatch.

Treatment
each of the compounde0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
egg hatch of M. incognitae0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The egg hatch of M. incognita was suppressed by each of the compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate had the strongest concentration-dependent egg-hatch effect.

Treatment
L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitatee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
egg hatch of M. incognitae1
Direction
suppressede1
Qualifier
most notable effect in a concentration-dependent mannere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate showed the most notable effect in a concentration-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1739 · show in text ↑
e1

“The egg hatch of M. incognita was suppressed by each of the compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four compounds increased J2 mortality.

Treatment
All four compoundse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
J2 mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four compounds were associated with increased J2 mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethyl phthalate at 2 mmol·L-1 gave the greatest J2 mortality effect.

Treatment
dimethyl phthalate at 2 mmol·L-1e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
J2 mortalitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest effect was observed with dimethyl phthalate at 2 mmol·L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1875 · show in text ↑
e1

“All four compounds were associated with increased J2 mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dibutyl phthalate alone repelled M. incognita J2.

Treatment
Dibutyl phthalatee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita J2e0
Direction
repele0
Comparator
other compoundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dibutyl phthalate was the only compound observed to repel M. incognita J2 with no effect being detected in the other compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–2003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each of four compounds correlated with reduced disease index in susceptible T tomato.

Material
Te0
Treatment
four compoundse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Each of the four compounds were correlated with a reduction in disease index in the susceptible cultivar, T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–17 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate at 2 mmol·L-1 gave seedlings the best nematode resistance.

Treatment
irrigated with L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate at 2 mmol·L-1e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to M. incognitae0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato seedlings irrigated with L-ascorbyl 2,6-dipalmitate at 2 mmol·L-1 showed the best resistance to M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2233 · show in text ↑

grafting · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

allelopathy · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.