Paper · 2016 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Crop rotation affects soybean performance in no-tillage system under optimal and dry cropping seasons

Mirianny Elena Freitas; Luiz Carlos Ferreira de Souza; Júlio Cesar Salton; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to assess the crop rotation affects on agronomic traits of soybean in optimal (OCS) and dry cropping seasons (DCS). This research was carried out in 2010/2011 (OCS) and 2011/2012 (DCS) in a Rhodic Hapludox soil. The experimental design was set up in a randomized complete block and the treatments were arranged in a factorial 9 x 2, consisting of 9 crop rotations systems and two cropping seasons, with four replications. The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR) was sowed on October 20 th 2010 and October 10 th 2011 (spring-summer season) 20 days after the fall-winter cover crops desiccation. It was assessed in the R8 reproductive stage (Full maturation) the plant height, the height of the first pod insertion, number of pod per plants, number of branches per plant, number of seed per pod, 1000-grain weight and grain yield. It was observed that in drought stress (DCS), the number of branches decreased, this reduction was 36% in relation to OCS. For the traits as plant height, first pod height, 1000-grain weight and yield, it was showed small values in DCS in contrast to OCS. It is feasible to introduce these cover crops in fall-winter season to make part of a crop rotation system. The number of pod per plant showed higher values under the crop rotation of corn/rapeseed/soybean, which showed highly associated with the soybean grain yield. This research brought options for cover crops system to be viable in no-till system with soybean in spring-summer season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress in the dry cropping season reduced the number of soybean branches by 36% relative to the optimal season.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Material
BMX-Potncia RRe1
Treatment
drought stress (DCS)e2
Outcome
number of branchese2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
36%e2
Comparator
OCSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was observed that in drought stress (DCS), the number of branches decreased, this reduction was 36% in relation to OCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the dry cropping season, plant height, first pod height and 1000-grain weight of soybean had small values relative to the optimal season.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
DCSe2
Outcome
plant height, first pod height, 1000-grain weighte2
Direction
small valuese2
Comparator
OCSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the traits as plant height, first pod height, 1000-grain weight and yield, it was showed small values in DCS in contrast to OCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the dry cropping season, soybean yield had small values relative to the optimal season.

Taxon
Glycine maxGlycine maxe1
Treatment
DCSe2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
small valuese2
Comparator
OCSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
e2

“For the traits as plant height, first pod height, 1000-grain weight and yield, it was showed small values in DCS in contrast to OCS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corn/rapeseed/soybean rotation gave higher pod numbers per plant, which were highly associated with soybean grain yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
crop rotation of corn/rapeseed/soybeane3
Outcome
number of pod per plante3
Direction
higher valuese3
Qualifier
highly associated with the soybean grain yielde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The number of pod per plant showed higher values under the crop rotation of corn/rapeseed/soybean, which showed highly associated with the soybean grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1390 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing these cover crops in the fall-winter season is feasible as part of a soybean crop rotation system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
introduce these cover crops in fall-winter seasone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
e4

“It is feasible to introduce these cover crops in fall-winter season to make part of a crop rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cover crop system can be viable in no-till soybean production in the spring-summer season.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
viable in no-till systeme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean (Glycine max cv. BMX-Potncia RR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–499 · show in text ↑
e5

“This research brought options for cover crops system to be viable in no-till system with soybean in spring-summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1512 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

climate site · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

73 papers: 36 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

rotation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 107 positive, 37 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

drought · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 35 positive, 179 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.