Paper · 2016 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Agronomic nitrogen‐use efficiency of rice can be increased by drivingOsNRT2.1expression with theOsNAR2.1promoter

Jingguang Chen; Yong Zhang; Yawen Tan; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
197
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The importance of the nitrate (NO3-) transporter for yield and nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) in rice was previously demonstrated using map-based cloning. In this study, we enhanced the expression of the OsNRT2.1 gene, which encodes a high-affinity NO3- transporter, using a ubiquitin (Ubi) promoter and the NO3--inducible promoter of the OsNAR2.1 gene to drive OsNRT2.1 expression in transgenic rice plants. Transgenic lines expressing pUbi:OsNRT2.1 or pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 constructs exhibited the increased total biomass including yields of approximately 21% and 38% compared with wild-type (WT) plants. The agricultural NUE (ANUE) of the pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines decreased to 83% of that of the WT plants, while the ANUE of the pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines increased to 128% of that of the WT plants. The dry matter transfer into grain decreased by 68% in the pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines and increased by 46% in the pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines relative to the WT. The expression of OsNRT2.1 in shoot and grain showed that Ubi enhanced OsNRT2.1 expression by 7.5-fold averagely and OsNAR2.1 promoters increased by about 80% higher than the WT. Interestingly, we found that the OsNAR2.1 was expressed higher in all the organs of pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines; however, for pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines, OsNAR2.1 expression was only increased in root, leaf sheaths and internodes. We show that increased expression of OsNRT2.1, especially driven by OsNAR2.1 promoter, can improve the yield and NUE in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pUbi:OsNRT2.1 transgenic lines increased total biomass including yield by approximately 21% compared with wild-type plants.

Material
Transgenic linese1
Treatment
pUbi:OsNRT2.1e1
Gene
OsNRT2.1e1
Outcome
total biomass including yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21%e1
Comparator
wild-type (WT) plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic lines expressing pUbi:OsNRT2.1 or pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 constructs exhibited the increased total biomass including yields of approximately 21% and 38% compared with wild-type (WT) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 transgenic lines increased total biomass including yield by approximately 38% compared with wild-type plants.

Material
Transgenic linese1
Treatment
pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1e1
Gene
OsNRT2.1e1
Outcome
total biomass including yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38%e1
Comparator
wild-type (WT) plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transgenic lines expressing pUbi:OsNRT2.1 or pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 constructs exhibited the increased total biomass including yields of approximately 21% and 38% compared with wild-type (WT) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural NUE of pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines decreased to 83% of wild-type.

Treatment
pUbi:OsNRT2.1e2
Gene
OsNRT2.1e2
Outcome
agricultural NUE (ANUE)e2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
83%e2
Comparator
WT plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e2

“The agricultural NUE (ANUE) of the pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines decreased to 83% of that of the WT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agricultural NUE of pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines increased to 128% of wild-type.

Treatment
pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1e3
Gene
OsNRT2.1e3
Outcome
ANUEe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
128%e3
Comparator
WT plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e3

“the ANUE of the pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines increased to 128% of that of the WT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter transfer into grain decreased by 68% in pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines relative to wild-type.

Treatment
pUbi:OsNRT2.1e4
Gene
OsNRT2.1e4
Outcome
dry matter transfer into graine4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
68%e4
Comparator
WTe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dry matter transfer into grain decreased by 68% in the pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines and increased by 46% in the pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines relative to the WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter transfer into grain increased by 46% in pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines relative to wild-type.

Treatment
pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1e4
Gene
OsNRT2.1e4
Outcome
dry matter transfer into graine4
Direction
increasede4
Value
46%e4
Comparator
WTe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dry matter transfer into grain decreased by 68% in the pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines and increased by 46% in the pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines relative to the WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNAR2.1 was expressed higher in all organs of pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines.

Organ / stage
all the organse6
Treatment
pUbi:OsNRT2.1e6
Gene
OsNAR2.1e6
Outcome
OsNAR2.1 was expressede6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e6

“Interestingly, we found that the OsNAR2.1 was expressed higher in all the organs of pUbi:OsNRT2.1 lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines, OsNAR2.1 expression was increased only in root, leaf sheaths and internodes.

Organ / stage
root, leaf sheaths and internodese7
Treatment
pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1e7
Gene
OsNAR2.1e7
Outcome
OsNAR2.1 expressione7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
onlye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e7

“for pOsNAR2.1:OsNRT2.1 lines, OsNAR2.1 expression was only increased in root, leaf sheaths and internodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ubi enhanced OsNRT2.1 expression in shoot and grain by 7.5-fold on average.

Organ / stage
shoot and graine5
Treatment
Ubie5
Gene
OsNRT2.1e5
Outcome
OsNRT2.1 expressione5
Direction
enhancede5
Value
7.5-folde5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“The expression of OsNRT2.1 in shoot and grain showed that Ubi enhanced OsNRT2.1 expression by 7.5-fold averagely and OsNAR2.1 promoters increased by about 80% higher than the WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNAR2.1 promoters increased OsNRT2.1 expression in shoot and grain by about 80% compared with wild-type.

Organ / stage
shoot and graine5
Treatment
OsNAR2.1 promoterse5
Gene
OsNRT2.1e5
Outcome
expression of OsNRT2.1e5
Direction
increasede5
Value
80%e5
Comparator
WTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“The expression of OsNRT2.1 in shoot and grain showed that Ubi enhanced OsNRT2.1 expression by 7.5-fold averagely and OsNAR2.1 promoters increased by about 80% higher than the WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased OsNRT2.1 expression, especially driven by the OsNAR2.1 promoter, can improve yield and NUE in rice.

Treatment
increased expression of OsNRT2.1, especially driven by OsNAR2.1 promotere0
Gene
OsNRT2.1e0
Outcome
yield and NUEe0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“efficiency of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“We show that increased expression of OsNRT2.1, especially driven by OsNAR2.1 promoter, can improve the yield and NUE in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1469 · show in text ↑

transgenic · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.