Abstract
The present investigation on clonal multiplication of guava (Psidium guajava L.) soft wood cuttings was done with the aim to determine the most successful media and rooting hormone (IBA) concentration. Guava soft wood cuttings were treated with 0, 200, 400 and 600 mg kg -1 IBA solution when planted in three different rooting media (sand, silt and top soil) under low-plastic tunnel. The cuttings were allowed to grow under low-plastic tunnel for 90 day to evaluate the rooting capability and shooting competency. The study showed that the species has a great potential for clonal multiplication through soft wood cuttings. The highest number of roots and root length were observed in the cutting treated with 400 mg kg -1 IBA solution in sand, and the lowest in the cuttings without IBA treatment in sand media. In general 400 mg kg -1 IBA treatment with silt as rooting media performed better as compared to the other treatments. However, the highest survival percentage (50%) was observed in the cuttings rooted in silt media and treated with 200 mg kg -1 IBA solution. Experimental results showed the potential of clonal propagation of guava through soft wood cuttings treated with auxin under simpler and cheaper low-plastic tunnel.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Guava showed strong potential for clonal multiplication through soft wood cuttings.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Outcome
- great potential for clonal multiplication through soft wood cuttingse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The study showed that the species has a great potential for clonal multiplication through soft wood cuttings”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings treated with 400 mg kg -1 IBA in sand had the highest number of roots and root length.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 400 mg kg -1 IBA solution in sande0
- Outcome
- number of roots and root lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- cuttings without IBA treatment in sand mediae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest number of roots and root length were observed in the cutting treated with 400 mg kg -1 IBA solution in sand, and the lowest in the cuttings without IBA treatment in sand media”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings without IBA in sand had the lowest root number and root length.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- cuttings without IBA treatment in sand mediae0
- Outcome
- number of roots and root lengthe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- 400 mg kg -1 IBA solution in sande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest number of roots and root length were observed in the cutting treated with 400 mg kg -1 IBA solution in sand, and the lowest in the cuttings without IBA treatment in sand media”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava)”
Claim · model-written summary
IBA at 400 mg kg -1 with silt performed better than other treatments overall.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 400 mg kg -1 IBA treatment with silt as rooting mediae0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Comparator
- the other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In general 400 mg kg -1 IBA treatment with silt as rooting media performed better as compared to the other treatments”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings in silt with 200 mg kg -1 IBA had the highest survival, at 50%.
- Taxon
- Guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- cuttings rooted in silt media and treated with 200 mg kg -1 IBA solutione0
- Outcome
- survival percentagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 50%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest survival percentage (50%) was observed in the cuttings rooted in silt media and treated with 200 mg kg -1 IBA solution”
t0“Guava (Psidium guajava)”
Claim · model-written summary
Guava soft wood cuttings treated with auxin could be clonally propagated under a simpler, cheaper low-plastic tunnel.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavae0 - Treatment
- auxine0
- Outcome
- potential of clonal propagatione0
- Setting
- low-plastic tunnele0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experimental results showed the potential of clonal propagation of guava through soft wood cuttings treated with auxin under simpler and cheaper low-plastic tunnel”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · survival · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →in vitro · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →in vitro · survival · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
growing medium · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.