Paper · 2014 · European Journal of Experimental Biology

Effect of different media of cuttings on rooting of guava (Psidium guajava L.)

Ali Salehi Sardoei

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The guava, the most grown for high quality in Iran, is generally regarded as showing very good rooting ability. However, cuttings sometimes show moderate or even poor rooting performances, a problem likely related to the use of inappropriate rooting media. The aim of this work was to determine the most successful media among those traditionally used and to identify promising alternatives. march cuttings were planted in 8 different media in under mist propagation conditions. Substrates such as soil loam, Silt, sawdust, perlite, Sand, sand-coco peat, sand-perlite and silt-perlite were used pure or in mixtures. the results shown effect of different media (p<0.01) on root length, shoot length and shoot dry weight. Experimental results has shown that, high rooting percentage was achieved by semi-woody cuttings in sand with average of 20%, while the lowest percentage was obtained in loam and sawdust bed with average of 6.66%. The high and the lowest number of shoot number of shoot was achieved in soil loam, perlite and sand-perlite (1:1 v/v) 5.66, 2.66 and 3 respectively which show significant difference. Soil loam and sawdust, except for shoot number and root diameter, had the lowest positive effect on guava rooting. The highest rooting percentage, shoot length, dry and fresh weight of shoot was achieved in sand. coco peat-perlite (1:1 v/v) had no effect on rooting and their application had no positive effect on guava rooting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting medium affected guava root length, shoot length and shoot dry weight.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
different mediae0
Outcome
root length, shoot length and shoot dry weighte0
Qualifier
p<0.01e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results shown effect of different media (p<0.01) on root length, shoot length and shoot dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-woody guava cuttings rooted most in sand, averaging 20%.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Organ / stage
semi-woody cuttingse0
Treatment
sande0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
highe0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
loam and sawdust bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rooting percentage was achieved by semi-woody cuttings in sand with average of 20%, while the lowest percentage was obtained in loam and sawdust bed with average of 6.66%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava cuttings had the lowest rooting percentage in loam and sawdust, averaging 6.66%.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
loam and sawdust bede0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
6.66%e0
Comparator
sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rooting percentage was achieved by semi-woody cuttings in sand with average of 20%, while the lowest percentage was obtained in loam and sawdust bed with average of 6.66%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava cuttings in soil loam had 5.66 shoots.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
soil loame0
Outcome
number of shoote0
Value
5.66e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high and the lowest number of shoot number of shoot was achieved in soil loam, perlite and sand-perlite (1:1 v/v) 5.66, 2.66 and 3 respectively which show significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava cuttings in perlite had 2.66 shoots.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
perlitee0
Outcome
number of shoote0
Value
2.66e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high and the lowest number of shoot number of shoot was achieved in soil loam, perlite and sand-perlite (1:1 v/v) 5.66, 2.66 and 3 respectively which show significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava cuttings in sand-perlite (1:1 v/v) had 3 shoots.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
sand-perlite (1:1 v/v)e0
Outcome
number of shoote0
Value
3e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high and the lowest number of shoot number of shoot was achieved in soil loam, perlite and sand-perlite (1:1 v/v) 5.66, 2.66 and 3 respectively which show significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil loam and sawdust gave the lowest positive effects on guava rooting outside shoot number and root diameter.

Treatment
Soil loam and sawduste0
Outcome
guava rootinge0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
except for shoot number and root diametere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil loam and sawdust, except for shoot number and root diameter, had the lowest positive effect on guava rooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand gave the highest guava rooting percentage.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
sande0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting percentage, shoot length, dry and fresh weight of shoot was achieved in sand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand gave the highest guava shoot length and shoot dry and fresh weight.

Taxon
guava (Psidium guajava L.)Psidium guajavat0
Treatment
sande0
Outcome
shoot length, dry and fresh weight of shoote0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting percentage, shoot length, dry and fresh weight of shoot was achieved in sand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava (Psidium guajava L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coco peat-perlite had no positive effect on guava rooting.

Treatment
coco peat-perlite (1:1 v/v)e0
Outcome
guava rootinge0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coco peat-perlite (1:1 v/v) had no effect on rooting and their application had no positive effect on guava rooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1445 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.