Paper · 2010 · Journal of Northwest A&F University

Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield of cucumber and the soil nitrate-N content in solar greenhouse

Xiaoyan Liu; Yanan Tong; Shulan Zhang

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 The experiment was done to study the effects of different fertilization treatments on yield of cucumber and the soil nitrate-N content in solar greenhouse in order to supply theoretical basis for porper fertilization of cucumber cultivated in solar greenhouse.【Method】 The experiment chose two solar greenhouses and each with 5 treatments:control treatment(CK) with no inorganic fertilizer;optimum fertilization treatment(OPT)(Solar greenhouse 1,N 675 kg/hm2,P2O5 171 kg/hm2,K2O 810 kg/hm2;Solar greenhouse 2,N 788 kg/hm2,P2O5 200 kg/hm2,K2O 945 kg/hm2);50%OPT,the amount of N was 50% of OPT and the amounts of P2O5,K2O were similar to that of OPT;150%OPT,the amount of N was 150% of OPT and the amounts of P2O5,K2O were similar to that of OPT,farmer practice(FP)(Solar greenhouse 1,N 848 kg/hm2,P2O5 277 kg/hm2,K2O 1 307 kg/hm2;Solar greenhouse 2,N 884 kg/hm2,P2O5 338 kg/hm2,K2O 1 249 kg/hm2).The soil NO-3-N content,cucumber yield,dry matter,N use and N agronomy efficiency were measured.【Result】 The soil NO-3-N average content of 150% in solar greenhoure 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was 10.0% and 20.0% higher than that of OPT.Cucumber yield(135 and 169 t/hm2) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was the most,61.1% and 8.0%,24.5% and 4.8% higher than that of to CK,50%N.The amount of dry matter(5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2),N use efficiency(8.8% and 16.8%)and N agronomy efficiency(76 and 16 kg/kg) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 were the most.The amount of dry matter in OPT was 17.9% and 43.1%,3.0% and 34.3% higher than the CK,50%N.Cucumber yield was 14.9%,2.1% lower than that of OPT,N use efficiency 76.1% and 67.3% lower than that of OPT and N agronomy efficiency 56.2%,52.5% lower than that of OPT of 150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2.【Conclusion】 The optimum nitrogen is 675-788 kg/hm2 when the target yields of cucumber in solar greenhouse are 120-140 t/hm2,which can obtain the best economic benefit and output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate-N average content under the 150% N treatment in solar greenhouse 1 was 10.0% higher than under optimum fertilization (OPT) in cucumber production.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
soil NO-3-N average contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.0%e0
Comparator
OPTe0
Setting
solar greenhoure 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil NO-3-N average content of 150% in solar greenhoure 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was 10.0% and 20.0% higher than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate-N average content under the 150% N treatment in solar greenhouse 2 was 20.0% higher than under optimum fertilization (OPT) in cucumber production.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%e0
Outcome
soil NO-3-N average contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.0%e0
Comparator
OPTe0
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil NO-3-N average content of 150% in solar greenhoure 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was 10.0% and 20.0% higher than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under optimum fertilization (OPT) in solar greenhouse 1 was 61.1% higher than under CK.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
OPTe1
Outcome
Cucumber yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
61.1%e1
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
solar greenhouse 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cucumber yield(135 and 169 t/hm2) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was the most,61.1% and 8.0%,24.5% and 4.8% higher than that of to CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under optimum fertilization (OPT) in solar greenhouse 2 was 8.0% higher than under CK.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
OPTe1
Outcome
Cucumber yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.0%e1
Comparator
CKe1
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cucumber yield(135 and 169 t/hm2) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was the most,61.1% and 8.0%,24.5% and 4.8% higher than that of to CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under optimum fertilization (OPT) in solar greenhouse 1 was 24.5% higher than under 50%N.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
OPTe1
Outcome
Cucumber yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
24.5%e1
Comparator
50%Ne1
Setting
solar greenhouse 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cucumber yield(135 and 169 t/hm2) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was the most,61.1% and 8.0%,24.5% and 4.8% higher than that of to CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under optimum fertilization (OPT) in solar greenhouse 2 was 4.8% higher than under 50%N.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
OPTe1
Outcome
Cucumber yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.8%e1
Comparator
50%Ne1
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cucumber yield(135 and 169 t/hm2) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 was the most,61.1% and 8.0%,24.5% and 4.8% higher than that of to CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter amount in OPT cucumber was 17.9% higher than in CK (solar greenhouse 1).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe2
Outcome
dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Value
17.9%e2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The amount of dry matter in OPT was 17.9% and 43.1%,3.0% and 34.3% higher than the CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter amount in OPT cucumber was 43.1% higher than in CK (solar greenhouse 2).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe2
Outcome
dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Value
43.1%e2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The amount of dry matter in OPT was 17.9% and 43.1%,3.0% and 34.3% higher than the CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter amount in OPT cucumber was 3.0% higher than in 50%N (solar greenhouse 1).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe2
Outcome
dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Value
3.0%e2
Comparator
50%Ne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The amount of dry matter in OPT was 17.9% and 43.1%,3.0% and 34.3% higher than the CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter amount in OPT cucumber was 34.3% higher than in 50%N (solar greenhouse 2).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe2
Outcome
dry mattere2
Direction
highere2
Value
34.3%e2
Comparator
50%Ne2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The amount of dry matter in OPT was 17.9% and 43.1%,3.0% and 34.3% higher than the CK,50%N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT gave the highest dry matter amount (5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2) in solar greenhouses 1 and 2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe3
Outcome
dry mattere3
Direction
the moste3
Value
5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2e3
Setting
solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The amount of dry matter(5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2),N use efficiency(8.8% and 16.8%)and N agronomy efficiency(76 and 16 kg/kg) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 were the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT gave the highest N use efficiency (8.8% and 16.8%) in solar greenhouses 1 and 2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe3
Outcome
N use efficiencye3
Direction
the moste3
Value
8.8% and 16.8%e3
Setting
solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The amount of dry matter(5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2),N use efficiency(8.8% and 16.8%)and N agronomy efficiency(76 and 16 kg/kg) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 were the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPT gave the highest N agronomy efficiency (76 and 16 kg/kg) in solar greenhouses 1 and 2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
OPTe3
Outcome
N agronomy efficiencye3
Direction
the moste3
Value
76 and 16 kg/kge3
Setting
solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The amount of dry matter(5.6 and 10.3 t/hm2),N use efficiency(8.8% and 16.8%)and N agronomy efficiency(76 and 16 kg/kg) of OPT in solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2 were the most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under 150%N in solar greenhouse 1 was 14.9% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
Cucumber yielde4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
14.9%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cucumber yield was 14.9%,2.1% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1630 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield under 150%N in solar greenhouse 2 was 2.1% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
Cucumber yielde4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
2.1%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Cucumber yield was 14.9%,2.1% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1630 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N use efficiency under 150%N in solar greenhouse 1 was 76.1% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
N use efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
76.1%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“N use efficiency 76.1% and 67.3% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1686 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N use efficiency under 150%N in solar greenhouse 2 was 67.3% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
N use efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
67.3%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“N use efficiency 76.1% and 67.3% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1686 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N agronomy efficiency under 150%N in solar greenhouse 1 was 56.2% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
N agronomy efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
56.2%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“N agronomy efficiency 56.2%,52.5% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1747 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N agronomy efficiency under 150%N in solar greenhouse 2 was 52.5% lower than under OPT.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
150%N treatmente5
Outcome
N agronomy efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
52.5%e4
Comparator
OPTe4
Setting
solar greenhouse 2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“N agronomy efficiency 56.2%,52.5% lower than that of OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1747 · show in text ↑
e5

“150%N treatment for solar greenhouse 1 and solar greenhouse 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the optimum nitrogen is 675-788 kg/hm2 for cucumber in solar greenhouses with target yields of 120-140 t/hm2.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse6
Outcome
optimum nitrogene6
Qualifier
120-140 t/hm2e6
Setting
solar greenhousee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The optimum nitrogen is 675-788 kg/hm2 when the target yields of cucumber in solar greenhouse are 120-140 t/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1937 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.