Paper · 2010 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Rates on Pickling Cucumber Production

Deanna L. Osmond; Sheri L. Cahill; Jonathan R. Schultheis; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cucumbers require adequate nitrogen (N) for growth and development. This study was undertaken to determine the most effective tillage system and N rate for hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production. Three tillage systems and five N fertilizer rates were compared for effects on yield, fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE), and effects on belly rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani. In both years conventional tillage had greater yields than no till and was greater than strip tillage one year. Cucumber NUE was not different between tillage systems or N rates; NUE averaged 35%. In one of two years, incidence of belly rot disease was greater under no till and increased with increasing N rate; in the other year, there was no affect of tillage on belly rot. In most years, conventional tillage for cucumbers will outperform strip tillage and no till.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave greater cucumber yields than no till in both years.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
In both yearse1
Comparator
no tille1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both years conventional tillage had greater yields than no till and was greater than strip tillage one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave greater cucumber yields than strip tillage in one year.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
one yeare1
Comparator
strip tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both years conventional tillage had greater yields than no till and was greater than strip tillage one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber NUE did not differ between tillage systems or N rates.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
tillage systems or N ratese2
Outcome
NUEe2
Direction
not differente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cucumber NUE was not different between tillage systems or N rates; NUE averaged 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber NUE averaged 35%.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Outcome
NUEe2
Value
35%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cucumber NUE was not different between tillage systems or N rates; NUE averaged 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of two years, belly rot incidence was greater under no till, caused by Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
no tille3
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie4pathogen
Outcome
incidence of belly rot diseasee3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
In one of two yearse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“In one of two years, incidence of belly rot disease was greater under no till and increased with increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–718 · show in text ↑
e4

“belly rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–405 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belly rot incidence increased with increasing N rate.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
increasing N ratee3
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie4pathogen
Outcome
incidence of belly rot diseasee3
Direction
increasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e3

“In one of two years, incidence of belly rot disease was greater under no till and increased with increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–718 · show in text ↑
e4

“belly rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the other year, tillage had no effect on belly rot.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
tillagee5
Outcome
belly rote5
Direction
no affecte5
Qualifier
in the other yeare5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the other year, there was no affect of tillage on belly rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–782 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage is recommended for cucumbers because it outperforms strip tillage and no till in most years.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativuse0
Treatment
conventional tillage for cucumberse6
Outcome
outperform strip tillage and no tille6
Qualifier
In most yearse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-picked, processing, cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–221 · show in text ↑
e6

“In most years, conventional tillage for cucumbers will outperform strip tillage and no till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–875 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.