Paper · 2016 · Genetics and Molecular Research

Mutagenic influences of colchicine on phenological and molecular diversity of Calendula officinalis L.

Y.I. El-Nashar; M.H. Ammar

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
42
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Six different colchicine concentrations: 0, 400, 800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 ppm, in combination with four soaking time treatments (1, 2, 3, and 4 h), were selected to assess the effects on germination, vegetative growth, and flower yield components in calendula plants. The molecular diversity among the treatments was assessed using ten SRAP marker combinations. Seed soaking in colchicine significantly enhanced both the fresh and the dry shoot and root masses, flowering date, number of flowers per plant, and flower diameter. At 1200-ppm colchicine combined with a 4-h soaking time, a superior effect on seed germination was observed, whereas 800 ppm for 4 h produced the highest number of flowers and the largest flower diameter. The earliest flowering time was found at 800 ppm combined with a short soaking time (1 h), while the 4-h soaking time with 800 ppm, is recommended for growing calendula outdoors, since it enhances flower development. At the molecular level, 752 fragments were successfully amplified using the SRAP primers, with 280 genetic loci found throughout the calendula genome. The polymorphism percentage ranged from 79 to 100% and the polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged between 0.85 and 0.97. The high number of detected loci and PIC values suggests a great power of SRAP markers in detecting mutant molecular diversity. Our results clearly show the existence of genetic variation among colchicine treated calendula plants and the clustering of the studied mutants was concordant with the colchicine concentration used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in colchicine significantly enhanced fresh and dry shoot and root masses of calendula.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
Seed soaking in colchicinee0
Outcome
fresh and the dry shoot and root massese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed soaking in colchicine significantly enhanced both the fresh and the dry shoot and root masses, flowering date, number of flowers per plant, and flower diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking in colchicine significantly enhanced flowering date, number of flowers per plant and flower diameter of calendula.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
Seed soaking in colchicinee0
Outcome
flowering date, number of flowers per plant, and flower diametere0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed soaking in colchicine significantly enhanced both the fresh and the dry shoot and root masses, flowering date, number of flowers per plant, and flower diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine at 1200 ppm combined with a 4-h soaking time had a superior effect on calendula seed germination.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
1200-ppm colchicine combined with a 4-h soaking timee0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
superior effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 1200-ppm colchicine combined with a 4-h soaking time, a superior effect on seed germination was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colchicine at 800 ppm for 4 h produced the highest number of flowers and the largest flower diameter in calendula.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
800 ppm for 4 he0
Outcome
highest number of flowers and the largest flower diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“800 ppm for 4 h produced the highest number of flowers and the largest flower diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earliest flowering time in calendula was found at 800 ppm colchicine combined with a short 1 h soaking time.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
800 ppm combined with a short soaking time (1 h)e0
Outcome
flowering timee0
Direction
earlieste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The earliest flowering time was found at 800 ppm combined with a short soaking time (1 h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–823 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 4-h soaking time with 800 ppm colchicine for growing calendula outdoors because it enhances flower development.

Taxon
calendulaCalendulae0
Outcome
the 4-h soaking time with 800 ppme0
Setting
outdoorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula
Calendula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 4-h soaking time with 800 ppm, is recommended for growing calendula outdoors, since it enhances flower development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten SRAP primer combinations amplified 752 fragments in colchicine-treated calendula.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Outcome
fragments were successfully amplifiede0
Value
752e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“752 fragments were successfully amplified using the SRAP primers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The SRAP primers detected 280 genetic loci throughout the calendula genome.

Taxon
calendulaCalendulae0
Outcome
genetic locie0
Value
280e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula
Calendula · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“280 genetic loci found throughout the calendula genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The polymorphism percentage of the SRAP markers in calendula ranged from 79 to 100%.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Outcome
polymorphism percentagee0
Value
79 to 100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The polymorphism percentage ranged from 79 to 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphic information content values of the SRAP markers in calendula ranged between 0.85 and 0.97.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Outcome
polymorphic information content (PIC) valuese0
Value
0.85 and 0.97e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged between 0.85 and 0.97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1234 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the high number of detected loci and PIC values indicate a great power of SRAP markers in detecting mutant molecular diversity.

Outcome
power of SRAP markers in detecting mutant molecular diversitye0
Value
0.85 and 0.97e1

Verbatim

e0

“The high number of detected loci and PIC values suggests a great power of SRAP markers in detecting mutant molecular diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“ranged between 0.85 and 0.97”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic variation exists among colchicine-treated calendula plants.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Outcome
genetic variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the existence of genetic variation among colchicine treated calendula plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clustering of the studied calendula mutants was concordant with the colchicine concentration used.

Taxon
Calendula officinalis L.Calendula officinalist0
Treatment
colchicine concentratione0
Outcome
clustering of the studied mutantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Calendula officinalis
Calendula officinalis · TaxonBetty Cai · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Calendula officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“the clustering of the studied mutants was concordant with the colchicine concentration used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1561 · show in text ↑

colchicine · growth · Calendula officinalis (pot marigold)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Calendula officinalis (pot marigold)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · phenology · Calendula officinalis (pot marigold)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · growth · Calendula officinalis (pot marigold)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.