Paper · 2011

Effects of Biological Seed Dressing Agent on Seedling Growth of Super Hybrid Rice

Ning Hui-min

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four biological seed dressing agents were used to dispose super hybrid rice seeds,and the results showed that A treatment had the highest SPAD value and chlorophyll content;B treatment had the best effect for strengthening root activity of rice seedling;C treatment enhanced leaf area and proline content tremendously;D treatment promoted root dry weight of rice seedling significantly.Four traits,SPAD,leaf area,root dry weight and root activity,were used for evaluating comprehensive quality of seedlings by mean membership index value,and the results indicated that B treatment was the greatest(0.88) than others,therefore,the B treatment had the best effects for promoting seedling growth and improving comprehensive quality of seedling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A treatment had the highest SPAD value and chlorophyll content.

Treatment
A treatmente0
Outcome
SPAD value and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A treatment had the highest SPAD value and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B treatment best strengthened rice seedling root activity.

Treatment
B treatmente0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B treatment had the best effect for strengthening root activity of rice seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C treatment greatly increased leaf area and proline content.

Treatment
C treatmente0
Outcome
leaf area and proline contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“C treatment enhanced leaf area and proline content tremendously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

D treatment significantly promoted rice seedling root dry weight.

Treatment
D treatmente0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D treatment promoted root dry weight of rice seedling significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B treatment had the highest mean membership index for comprehensive seedling quality, at 0.88.

Treatment
B treatmente0
Outcome
greateste0
Direction
greateste0
Value
0.88e0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“B treatment was the greatest(0.88) than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–615 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.