Paper · 2008 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Effect of Water and Fertilizer Control on Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato

Baike Wang

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

According to the data of variance analysis,it can be seen that N-Fertilizer and K-Fertilizer have a great effect on improving the contain of lycopene,and this effect has great difference.At the same time,the days of interval before harvest has no effect on improving the contain of lycopene;for total acid,the quantity of N-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving total acid,but there is no significant difference in affecting function;For brix,K-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving brix,and this affection has great difference; for yield of planter and the weight of fruit,each factor has no effect on improving them.The conclution drawn above remains to be confirmed by a lot of practice and experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N-Fertilizer and K-Fertilizer had a great effect on improving lycopene content in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
N-Fertilizer and K-Fertilizere0
Outcome
contain of lycopenee0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“N-Fertilizer and K-Fertilizer have a great effect on improving the contain of lycopene,and this effect has great difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days of interval before harvest had no effect on lycopene content in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
the days of interval before harveste1
Outcome
contain of lycopenee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the days of interval before harvest has no effect on improving the contain of lycopene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantity of N-Fertilizer had a great effect on improving total acid in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
the quantity of N-Fertilizere2
Outcome
total acide2
Direction
improvinge2
Qualifier
there is no significant difference in affecting functione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“for total acid,the quantity of N-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving total acid,but there is no significant difference in affecting function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days of interval before harvest had a great effect on improving total acid in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
the days of interval before harveste2
Outcome
total acide2
Direction
improvinge2
Qualifier
there is no significant difference in affecting functione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“for total acid,the quantity of N-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving total acid,but there is no significant difference in affecting function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K-Fertilizer had a great effect on improving brix in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
K-Fertilizere3
Outcome
brixe3
Direction
improvinge3
Qualifier
this affection has great differencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“For brix,K-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving brix,and this affection has great difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Days of interval before harvest had a great effect on improving brix in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
the days of interval before harveste3
Outcome
brixe3
Direction
improvinge3
Qualifier
this affection has great differencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“For brix,K-Fertilizer and the days of interval before harvest have a great effect on improving brix,and this affection has great difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each factor had no effect on yield of plant and fruit weight in processing tomato.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
each factore4
Outcome
yield of planter and the weight of fruite4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Quality and Yield of Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“for yield of planter and the weight of fruit,each factor has no effect on improving them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–709 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

potassium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 19 positive, 8 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.