Paper · 2010

Study on organic carbon decomposition regularity of organic materials in different incorporation methods

Jiuming Zhang

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Net bag method and sand strainer tube were used to determine decomposition characteristics of corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field.The results showed that after 150 d in net bag method,biology quantity of corn and soybean stalks were decomposed from 38.9% to 46.6%.The decomposition trend of stalks was soil coverage treatment open air treatment,and corn stalk of soil coveragesoybean stalk of soil coverage,decomposing regularities of soybean and corn stalk in the open air were almost the same.From the view of tissue structure,tissue had become blurred and loose,when the basic tissue and vascular bundle were broken in corn stalk the following time.But tissue structure of soybean stalk did not change significantly.The decomposition regularity of stalksorganic carbon in different incorporation methods was corn stalksoybean stalk.Under simulated conditions of the sand strainer tubes,corn,soybean stalk and root stubble were similar trends in organic carbon decomposition.All the decomposition regularities were faster at the beginning of buried tubes,and slower at the later.The decomposition rate of organic carbon was corn stalksoybean stalk.After reducing C/N,the organic carbon decomposition rate of various organic materials was higher than that of no adjusting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn and soybean stalks decomposed by 38.9% to 46.6% in the net bag method after 150 days.

Treatment
net bag methode2
Outcome
biology quantitye2
Value
38.9% to 46.6%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“after 150 d in net bag method,biology quantity of corn and soybean stalks were decomposed from 38.9% to 46.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–322 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil coverage and open-air treatments differed in the decomposition trend of stalks; the direction is not resolved in the abstract.

Treatment
soil coverage treatmente3
Outcome
decomposition trend of stalkse3
Comparator
open air treatmente3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e3

“The decomposition trend of stalks was soil coverage treatment open air treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposition regularities of soybean and corn stalk in the open air were almost the same.

Taxon
soybean and corn stalke4
Outcome
decomposing regularitiese4
Qualifier
almost the samee4
Setting
open aire4

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e4

“decomposing regularities of soybean and corn stalk in the open air were almost the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn stalk tissue became blurred and loose when basic tissue and vascular bundles broke down over time.

Taxon
corn stalke5
Outcome
tissue structuree5
Qualifier
blurred and loosee5

Verbatim

e5

“From the view of tissue structure,tissue had become blurred and loose,when the basic tissue and vascular bundle were broken in corn stalk the following time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean stalk tissue structure did not change significantly during decomposition.

Taxon
soybean stalke6
Outcome
tissue structuree6
Qualifier
did not change significantlye6

Verbatim

e6

“But tissue structure of soybean stalk did not change significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–777 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon decomposition regularity of corn stalk and soybean stalk differed among incorporation methods; the direction is not resolved in the abstract.

Taxon
corn stalke7
Treatment
different incorporation methodse7
Outcome
decomposition regularity of stalksorganic carbone7
Comparator
soybean stalke7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e7

“The decomposition regularity of stalksorganic carbon in different incorporation methods was corn stalksoybean stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–893 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under simulated sand strainer tube conditions, corn, soybean stalk and root stubble showed similar trends of organic carbon decomposition.

Outcome
organic carbon decompositione1
Setting
simulated conditions of the sand strainer tubese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under simulated conditions of the sand strainer tubes,corn,soybean stalk and root stubble were similar trends in organic carbon decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1035 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposition rate of organic carbon in corn and soybean stalks differed between the two stalks; the direction is not resolved in the abstract.

Taxon
corn stalke1
Outcome
decomposition rate of organic carbone1
Comparator
soybean stalke1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The decomposition rate of organic carbon was corn stalksoybean stalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposition of organic carbon was faster at the beginning of burial in tubes.

Treatment
buried tubese2
Outcome
decomposition regularitiese2
Direction
fastere2
Qualifier
at the beginning of buried tubese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the decomposition regularities were faster at the beginning of buried tubes,and slower at the later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1139 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposition of organic carbon was slower later in burial in tubes.

Treatment
buried tubese2
Outcome
decomposition regularitiese2
Direction
slowere2
Qualifier
at the latere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the decomposition regularities were faster at the beginning of buried tubes,and slower at the later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1139 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing C/N raised the organic carbon decomposition rate of various organic materials above that without adjustment.

Treatment
reducing C/Ne2
Outcome
organic carbon decomposition ratee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
no adjustinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“corn and soybean stalks of organic carbon under different incorporation methods into the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“After reducing C/N, the organic carbon decomposition rate of various organic materials was higher than that of no adjusting”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1209–1331 · show in text ↑