Paper · 2003 · ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA

Effects of Sulfur on Protein Accumulation in Kernels of Winter Wheat

Yu Zhen

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of sulfur application on protein accumulation of two winter wheat cultivars (Lumai 22 and Yannong 15) in the 1998-1999. The available sulfur content in the experimental soil was 5.84 mg/kg. Treatments of 172.5 kg/hm 2 P 2O 5, 112.5 kg/hm 2 K 2O and 240 kg/hm 2 N were factorially combined with three S treatments (0, 67.5 and 90 kg/hm 2 S). In contrast, sulfur addition not only increased the nitrate reductase (NR) activity in roots and in flag leaves of wheat, but also increased total free amino acids content and soluble protein content in flag leaves, promoted protein synthesis in flag leaves. Endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activity in flag leaves increased as well, protein degradation promoted in response to S application. Treatment with 67.5 kg S /hm 2 increased glutenin accumulating rate and total protein content in kernels, improved quality, increased grain and protein yield; But treatment with 90 kg S/hm 2 increased gliadin at the expense of glutenin, the quality was not improved, the grain and protein yield were not increased significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur addition increased nitrate reductase activity in roots and flag leaves of wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Organ / stage
roots and in flag leavest0e0
Treatment
sulfur additiont0e0
Outcome
nitrate reductase (NR) activityt0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulfur addition not only increased the nitrate reductase (NR) activity in roots and in flag leaves of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur addition increased total free amino acids content and soluble protein content in flag leaves.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Organ / stage
flag leavest0e0
Treatment
sulfur additiont0e0
Outcome
total free amino acids content and soluble protein contentt0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulfur addition not only increased the nitrate reductase (NR) activity in roots and in flag leaves of wheat, but also increased total free amino acids content and soluble protein content in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur addition promoted protein synthesis in flag leaves.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Organ / stage
flag leavest0e0
Treatment
sulfur additiont0e0
Outcome
protein synthesist0e0
Direction
promotedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulfur addition not only increased the nitrate reductase (NR) activity in roots and in flag leaves of wheat, but also increased total free amino acids content and soluble protein content in flag leaves, promoted protein synthesis in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activity in flag leaves.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Organ / stage
flag leavest0e0
Treatment
S applicationt0e0
Outcome
Endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activityt0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activity in flag leaves increased as well, protein degradation promoted in response to S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application promoted protein degradation.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
S applicationt0e0
Outcome
protein degradationt0e0
Direction
promotedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activity in flag leaves increased as well, protein degradation promoted in response to S application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

67.5 kg S/hm2 increased glutenin accumulating rate and total protein content in kernels.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Organ / stage
kernelst0e0
Treatment
67.5 kg S /hm 2t0e0
Outcome
glutenin accumulating rate and total protein contentt0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with 67.5 kg S /hm 2 increased glutenin accumulating rate and total protein content in kernels, improved quality, increased grain and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

67.5 kg S/hm2 improved grain quality.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
67.5 kg S /hm 2t0e0
Outcome
qualityt0e0
Direction
improvedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with 67.5 kg S /hm 2 increased glutenin accumulating rate and total protein content in kernels, improved quality, increased grain and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

67.5 kg S/hm2 increased grain and protein yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
67.5 kg S /hm 2t0e0
Outcome
grain and protein yieldt0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment with 67.5 kg S /hm 2 increased glutenin accumulating rate and total protein content in kernels, improved quality, increased grain and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

90 kg S/hm2 increased gliadin at the expense of glutenin.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
90 kg S/hm 2t0e0
Outcome
gliadint0e0
Direction
increasedt0e0
Qualifier
at the expense of glutenint0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment with 90 kg S/hm 2 increased gliadin at the expense of glutenin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

90 kg S/hm2 did not improve quality.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
90 kg S/hm 2t0e0
Outcome
qualityt0e0
Direction
not improvedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment with 90 kg S/hm 2 increased gliadin at the expense of glutenin, the quality was not improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

90 kg S/hm2 did not significantly increase grain and protein yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0e0
Treatment
90 kg S/hm 2t0e0
Outcome
grain and protein yieldt0e0
Direction
not increasedt0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment with 90 kg S/hm 2 increased gliadin at the expense of glutenin, the quality was not improved, the grain and protein yield were not increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1124 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.