Paper · 2008 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Effects of Sulfur Application on Sugar Content of Flag Leaves and Starch Accumulation of Kernels in Wheat

Fan Wang

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of sulfur application on soluble sugar and source content in flag leaf and starch accumulation in grains were studied in field experiments,using two wheat cultivars of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8.The results showed that,compared with S0,sulfur could increase soluble sugar and sucrose content of flag leaf,enhance the supply capability of assimilation in source organs.Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel during the earlier grain-filling stage,but also accelerated transformation of soluble sugar,thereby favoring sucrose degradation,increased the rate of starch accumulation.Finaly sulfur could sigfinicantly increase kernel weight and stach content in two cultivars.Grain yield of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8 were increased 12.74% and 6.16%,respectively,stach content was increased 4.66% and 6.20%,respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased soluble sugar and sucrose in wheat flag leaves relative to S0.

Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
soluble sugar and sucrose content of flag leafe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
S0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with S0,sulfur could increase soluble sugar and sucrose content of flag leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur enhanced assimilation supply capability in wheat source organs.

Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
supply capability of assimilation in source organse0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfur could increase soluble sugar and sucrose content of flag leaf,enhance the supply capability of assimilation in source organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in wheat kernels during early grain filling.

Organ / stage
earlier grain-filling stagee0
Treatment
Sulfure0
Outcome
soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernele0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel during the earlier grain-filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur accelerated soluble sugar transformation and favored sucrose degradation in wheat grain.

Treatment
Sulfure0
Outcome
transformation of soluble sugar,thereby favoring sucrose degradatione0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel during the earlier grain-filling stage,but also accelerated transformation of soluble sugar,thereby favoring sucrose degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased the rate of starch accumulation in wheat grain.

Treatment
Sulfure1
Outcome
rate of starch accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the rate of starch accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur significantly increased kernel weight in both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
sulfure0
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfur could sigfinicantly increase kernel weight and stach content in two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased Yunong 949 wheat grain yield by 12.74%.

Material
Yunong 949e0
Treatment
Sulfure1
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8 were increased 12.74% and 6.16%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased Lankaoaizao 8 wheat grain yield by 6.16%.

Material
Lankaoaizao 8e0
Treatment
Sulfure1
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8 were increased 12.74% and 6.16%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–814 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased Yunong 949 starch content by 4.66%.

Material
Yunong 949e0
Treatment
Sulfure1
Outcome
stach contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8 were increased 12.74% and 6.16%,respectively,stach content was increased 4.66% and 6.20%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur increased Lankaoaizao 8 starch content by 6.20%.

Material
Lankaoaizao 8e0
Treatment
Sulfure1
Outcome
stach contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of Yunong 949 and Lankaoaizao 8 were increased 12.74% and 6.16%,respectively,stach content was increased 4.66% and 6.20%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfur not only greatly improved soluble sugar and sucrose content in the kernel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.