Paper · 2008 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)

A Limujiang

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.) density on the plant character,dry matter accumulation per plant,yield character and yield,the trait of changing trends of the leaf area per plant and leaf area index(LAI) were studied under the condition of super-high yield in this experiment.The result showed that with the increase of the chickpea planting density,the plant birthing period were advanced,the plant height were heightened,LAI were increased and dry matter accumulation per plant were decreased.The No.of effectual pods per plant reduced remarkably with the increase of density.The No.of granule per pod and granule weight were not very related to the plant density.The protein content,flax acid content and twenty carbon alkene acid content are increased with the increase of density.The comprehensive performance of 445 thousand plants per ha was the best,with the highest yield 5 946.09 kg/hm2,and with good quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density advanced the chickpea birthing period.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
plant birthing periode0
Direction
advancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the increase of the chickpea planting density,the plant birthing period were advanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased chickpea height and leaf area index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
heightenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the increase of the chickpea planting density,the plant birthing period were advanced,the plant height were heightened,LAI were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased leaf area index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAI were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density reduced dry matter accumulation per plant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation per plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter accumulation per plant were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective pods per plant declined with density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
No.of effectual pods per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The No.of effectual pods per plant reduced remarkably with the increase of density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per pod were weakly related to density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
No.of granule per pode0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The No.of granule per pod and granule weight were not very related to the plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight was weakly related to density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
granule weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The No.of granule per pod and granule weight were not very related to the plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content increased with density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content,flax acid content and twenty carbon alkene acid content are increased with the increase of density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax acid content increased with density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
flax acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content,flax acid content and twenty carbon alkene acid content are increased with the increase of density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty carbon alkene acid content increased with density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
twenty carbon alkene acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content,flax acid content and twenty carbon alkene acid content are increased with the increase of density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of 445 thousand plants per ha gave the highest yield of 5 946.09 kg/hm2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
445 thousand plants per hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5 946.09 kg/hm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“445 thousand plants per ha was the best,with the highest yield 5 946.09 kg/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of 445 thousand plants per ha gave good quality.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
good qualitye0
Qualifier
445 thousand plants per hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“445 thousand plants per ha was the best,with the highest yield 5 946.09 kg/hm2,and with good quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.