Abstract
To study effect of humic acid liquid fertilizer(HALF)on the yield and quality of lettuces(Lactuca sativa),the treatment of chosing HALF as basal and topdressing fertilizers compared with the treatment of chosing compound fertilizer(CF)as basal fertilizer and urea as topdressing(control),through the random blocks field experiments design.The results indicated that compared with control and combining application of HALF and microelements as topdressing(T1),treatment of CF as basal fertilizer and HALF as topdressing(T1),the treatment of HALF as basal fertilizer and topdressing(T2),treatment of HALF as basal fertilizer had soluble sugar contents increasing by 20.8%,51.5% and 88.6%,and soluble protein contents by 13.9%,14.1%,38.7%,respectively.Under the same nutrient supplies,HALF increased soluble sugar and soluble protein contents,improved the quality of lettuces.Among all of the treatments,T3 was best.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble sugar by 20.8% versus control.
- Taxon
- lettuces
Lactuca sativat0 - Treatment
- HALF as basal fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contentse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 20.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“treatment of HALF as basal fertilizer had soluble sugar contents increasing by 20.8%,51.5% and 88.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble sugar by 51.5% versus combined HALF and microelements.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- HALF as basal fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contentse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 51.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“treatment of HALF as basal fertilizer had soluble sugar contents increasing by 20.8%,51.5% and 88.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble sugar by 88.6% versus CF basal and HALF topdressing.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- HALF as basal fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contentse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 88.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“treatment of HALF as basal fertilizer had soluble sugar contents increasing by 20.8%,51.5% and 88.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble protein by 13.9% versus control.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Outcome
- soluble protein contentse0
- Value
- 13.9%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“soluble protein contents by 13.9%,14.1%,38.7%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble protein by 14.1% versus combined HALF and microelements.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Outcome
- soluble protein contentse0
- Value
- 14.1%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“soluble protein contents by 13.9%,14.1%,38.7%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The basal fertilizer treatment increased soluble protein by 38.7% versus CF basal and HALF topdressing.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Outcome
- soluble protein contentse0
- Value
- 38.7%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“soluble protein contents by 13.9%,14.1%,38.7%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
HALF increased lettuce sugar and protein under equal nutrient supply.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- HALFe0
- Outcome
- soluble sugar and soluble protein contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- Under the same nutrient suppliese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“Under the same nutrient supplies,HALF increased soluble sugar and soluble protein contents”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 ranked best among all treatments.
- Taxon
- lettucesLactuca sativat0
- Outcome
- T3 was beste0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lettuces”
e0“Among all of the treatments,T3 was best”
The same questions in other papers
other · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.