Paper · 2013 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Different Application Amounts of Microbial Organic Fertilizer on Quality and Yield of Open Field Tomato

Jing Yu

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking processing tomato of 'Tunhe No.8' as experiment objects,and microbial organic fertilizer as material,the influence of different microbial organic fertilizers on yield and quality of open field tomatoes were studied.The results showed that each treatment that fixed with 50% chemical fertilizer,application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2 was the best among treatments under comprehensive evaluation,increased the chlorophyll SPAD values of tomato 10.29% significantly,photosynthetic rate 33.76%;reduced soil bulk density of 6.34%;soil salt 28.70%;increased soil organic matter 51.86%,rapid available phosphorus 117.75%,rapidly available potassium 36.17%.Significantly improved soil fertility levels;tomato maturity improved by 118.45%,yield by 98.47%,and the quality of tomato excellent,was the most appropriate application rate,next was application of 400 kg/667m2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 600 kg/667m2 microbial organic fertilizer rate was best in the comprehensive evaluation.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Material
Tunhe No.8e0
Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
best among treatments under comprehensive evaluatione1
Direction
beste1

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato of 'Tunhe No.8'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2 was the best among treatments under comprehensive evaluation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 600 kg/667m2 rate increased tomato chlorophyll SPAD values by 10.29%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
chlorophyll SPAD valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.29%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato of 'Tunhe No.8'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2 was the best among treatments under comprehensive evaluation,increased the chlorophyll SPAD values of tomato 10.29% significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 600 kg/667m2 rate increased photosynthetic rate by 33.76%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2 was the best among treatments under comprehensive evaluation,increased the chlorophyll SPAD values of tomato 10.29% significantly,photosynthetic rate 33.76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density fell by 6.34%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil bulk density of 6.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salt fell by 28.70%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
soil salte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28.70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil bulk density of 6.34%;soil salt 28.70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–566 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter increased by 51.86%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
51.86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil organic matter 51.86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapid available phosphorus increased by 117.75%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
rapid available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
117.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil organic matter 51.86%,rapid available phosphorus 117.75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–638 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapidly available potassium increased by 36.17%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
rapidly available potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased soil organic matter 51.86%,rapid available phosphorus 117.75%,rapidly available potassium 36.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato maturity improved by 118.45%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
tomato maturitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
118.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato maturity improved by 118.45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield improved by 98.47%.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
98.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato maturity improved by 118.45%,yield by 98.47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 600 kg/667m2 rate produced excellent tomato quality.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
quality of tomato excellente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of tomato excellent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 600 kg/667m2 as the most appropriate rate, followed by 400 kg/667m2.

Treatment
application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2e1
Outcome
most appropriate application ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was the most appropriate application rate,next was application of 400 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of microbial organic fertilizer 600 kg/667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.