Paper · 2006 · Tianjin Agricultural Sciences

Influence on Different Cultivating Measure to the Yield and Quality of Spring Wheat

Wang Ji-zhong

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The test is designed different density and fertilizer dose in order to improve yield of spring wheat Jinqiang No.1 while assuring its good quality.The results showed: Jinqiang No.1 has the highest yield(169.45 kg/667m2)when seeding quantity is 40 000 kg/667m2 and fertilizer Carbamide 15 kg at jointing stage and 5 kg at full bloom stage;It is no effection of different density to quality indexes;There is no coherence on quality indexes with fertilizer dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jinqiang No.1 yielded 169.45 kg/667m2 under the specified seeding and Carbamide schedule.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Jinqiang No.1e0
Treatment
seeding quantity is 40 000 kg/667m2 and fertilizer Carbamide 15 kg at jointing stage and 5 kg at full bloom stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
169.45 kg/667m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“Jinqiang No.1 has the highest yield(169.45 kg/667m2)when seeding quantity is 40 000 kg/667m2 and fertilizer Carbamide 15 kg at jointing stage and 5 kg at full bloom stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding density had no effect on Jinqiang No.1 quality indexes.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different densitye0
Outcome
quality indexese0
Direction
no effectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is no effection of different density to quality indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–396 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer dose showed no coherent relationship with Jinqiang No.1 quality indexes.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilizer dosee0
Outcome
quality indexese0
Direction
no coherencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e0

“There is no coherence on quality indexes with fertilizer dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–458 · show in text ↑

urea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.