Paper · 2018 · International scientific and practical conference "Agro-SMART - Smart solutions for agriculture" (Agro-SMART 2018)

Influence of Mineral Fertilizers on Winter Wheat Yield

Ksenia Moiseeva; Alexander Karmatskiy; Anastasia Moiseeva

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The article considers the issue revealing the impact of slow-acting nitrogen fertilizers on the formation of leaf area and winter wheat productivity. A number of research was conducted in 2014-2017 in the forest-steppe zone of the Tyumen region, on leached chernozem, a predecessor is pure steam. In the period of earing the development of the leaf apparatus of winter wheat has been intensified by 0.18-4.73%, with respect to the control (without fertilizers) and other compared variants. Concerning the structure of winter wheat yield, within the period of study, the third, fourth and sixth variants of the experiment are traced, in which the control variant (without fertilizers) was exceeded by the largest number of indicators to the yield structure. The yield in the third, fourth and fifth variants was close in value, respectively, 3.36-3.41 kilo/ha, which is higher by 0.27-0.32 kilo/ha. The second option with the introduction of urea (60 kg / ha ai) appeared to be less effective: the average yield increase was 0.66% relative to the control. The yield of winter wheat, depending on the weather conditions of winter period, can vary from 2.20 to 4.58 t/ha, with a yield increase of up to 0.51 kilo/ha, which can positively affect the economic efficiency of cultivation and distribution of this yield in the Northern foreststeppe of the Tyumen region. It was established that the highest yield increase compared with the control one was obtained in the sixth variant with fertilization including carbamide encapsulated according to "Si" technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

development of the leaf apparatus in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
winter wheate0
Outcome
development of the leaf apparatuse0
Direction
intensifiede0
Value
0.18-4.73%e0
Comparator
control (without fertilizers)e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the period of earing the development of the leaf apparatus of winter wheat has been intensified by 0.18-4.73%, with respect to the control (without fertilizers) and other compared variants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield structure in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
third, fourth and sixth variantse0
Outcome
yield structuree0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
control variant (without fertilizers)e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Concerning the structure of winter wheat yield, within the period of study, the third, fourth and sixth variants of the experiment are traced, in which the control variant (without fertilizers) was exceeded by the largest number of indicators to the yield structure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
third, fourth and fifth variantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.36-3.41 kilo/hae0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield in the third, fourth and fifth variants was close in value, respectively, 3.36-3.41 kilo/ha, which is higher by 0.27-0.32 kilo/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

average yield increase in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
urea (60 kg / ha ai)e0
Outcome
average yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.66%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The second option with the introduction of urea (60 kg / ha ai) appeared to be less effective: the average yield increase was 0.66% relative to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
varye0
Value
2.20 to 4.58 t/hae0
Setting
Tyumen regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of winter wheat, depending on the weather conditions of winter period, can vary from 2.20 to 4.58 t/ha, with a yield increase of up to 0.51 kilo/ha, which can positively affect the economic efficiency of cultivation and distribution of this yield in the Northern foreststeppe of the Tyumen region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1362 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield increase in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
up to 0.51 kilo/hae0
Setting
Tyumen regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield of winter wheat, depending on the weather conditions of winter period, can vary from 2.20 to 4.58 t/ha, with a yield increase of up to 0.51 kilo/ha, which can positively affect the economic efficiency of cultivation and distribution of this yield in the Northern foreststeppe of the Tyumen region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield increase in winter wheat under the stated conditions.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fertilization including carbamide encapsulated according to "Si" technologye0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control onee0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“It was established that the highest yield increase compared with the control one was obtained in the sixth variant with fertilization including carbamide encapsulated according to "Si" technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1559 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

urea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.