Paper · 2007

Effects of Transient High Temperature after Anthesis on Grain Protein Content and Physiological Mechanism in Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)

Guo Wen

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat grain yield and quality are affected by environmental factors.Temperature is a major component in environmental variations with a marked effect on grain filling in wheat.Short period of heat shock,above 30℃ for a few days,happens frequently during grain filling period in many wheat-growing areas in the world,and becomes an important factor limiting wheat yield and quality.The present study investigated the effects of transient high temperature after anthesis on grain protein content and activities of nitrate reductase(NR) and glutamine synthetase(GS) in wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) to understand the mechanism of heat damage.We arranged daily average temperature 25,30,35,and 40℃,respectively in a phytotron,and treated wheat plants during different grain filling periods.The tested wheat cultivars were Yangmai 9 with weak gluten and Yangmai 12 with medium gluten.The results showed that grain protein content under the temperature above 35℃ from anthesis to the 33rd days after anthesis(DAA) was significantly higher than that under normal temperature,and significantly increased with the raise of temperature.There was a little effect of heat stress on protein content after the 33rd DAA.High temperature at different filling stages had different effects on protein content in grains.When heat shock temperature was above 35℃ at the early filling stage,the effect of heat shock from the 6th to 8th DAA was the greatest,followed by that from the 1st to 3rd DAA.Under the same temperature at the middle and late stages,the effect of heat shock from the 19th to 21st DAA was greater,while that from the 36th to 38th DAA was lower. Effects of heat shock at the early filling stage on grain protein content were greater than those at the middle and late stages.At the same stage,the higher the temperature,the lower the NR and GS activities in flag leaves.High temperature stress during grain filling decreased the duration of grain filling and grain weight,which increased grain protein content relatively.Heat damage led to lower quality of grain protein in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content above 35℃ through day 33 after anthesis was significantly higher than at normal temperature.

Treatment
temperature above 35℃e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
from anthesis to the 33rd days after anthesis(DAA)e0
Comparator
normal temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain protein content under the temperature above 35℃ from anthesis to the 33rd days after anthesis(DAA) was significantly higher than that under normal temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content significantly increased as temperature rose.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
grain protein contente2
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased with the raise of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain protein content under the temperature above 35℃ from anthesis to the 33rd days after anthesis(DAA) was significantly higher than that under normal temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress after day 33 had little effect on protein content.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Qualifier
after the 33rd DAAe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a little effect of heat stress on protein content after the 33rd DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early heat shock on days 6–8 had the greatest effect on grain protein content, followed by days 1–3.

Treatment
heat shock temperature was above 35℃e0
Outcome
effect of heat shocke0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
from the 6th to 8th DAAe0
Comparator
from the 1st to 3rd DAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When heat shock temperature was above 35℃ at the early filling stage,the effect of heat shock from the 6th to 8th DAA was the greatest,followed by that from the 1st to 3rd DAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At middle and late filling, heat shock on days 19–21 had a greater effect than heat shock on days 36–38.

Treatment
heat shock from the 19th to 21st DAAe0
Outcome
effect of heat shocke0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
from the 36th to 38th DAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same temperature at the middle and late stages,the effect of heat shock from the 19th to 21st DAA was greater,while that from the 36th to 38th DAA was lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock early in filling affected grain protein more than at middle and late stages.

Treatment
heat shock at the early filling stagee0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
middle and late stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of heat shock at the early filling stage on grain protein content were greater than those at the middle and late stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperatures lowered flag-leaf nitrate reductase activity.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
NRe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same stage,the higher the temperature,the lower the NR and GS activities in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperatures lowered flag-leaf glutamine synthetase activity.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
GSe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the same stage,the higher the temperature,the lower the NR and GS activities in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature stress shortened grain filling duration.

Treatment
High temperature stresse0
Outcome
duration of grain fillinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature stress during grain filling decreased the duration of grain filling and grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature stress decreased grain weight.

Treatment
High temperature stresse0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature stress during grain filling decreased the duration of grain filling and grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat damage lowered grain protein quality.

Treatment
Heat damagee0
Outcome
quality of grain proteine0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat damage led to lower quality of grain protein in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2075 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

50 papers: 26 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.