Paper · 1987 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Seed Hydration Treatments For Improved Sweet Corn Germination and Stand Establishment

Mark A. Bennett; Luther Waters

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract This research examines the potential of seed hydration for improving sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) seed performance, especially for plantings in cool (10°–15°C) soils. In addition to the effect of hydration treatments, the influence of seed quality and cultivar was evaluated using electrolyte leakage tests and seedling growth cold tests. Seed hydration treatments included seed hardening (a wetting/drying cycle), seed moisturizing (placing seed in moist vermiculite), and osmoconditioning, which were compared to a dry seed control. Hardening and moisturizing treatments improved early emergence by as much as 20%, while osmoconditioning significantly lowered field emergence. Seed moisturizing and hardening also improved uniformity of emergence, and reduced the number of days required to attain 50% or 75% emergence. Seed hydration treatments were effective with the three levels (high, medium, and low) of seed quality and the three cultivars (‘Jubilee’, ‘Midway’, and ‘Reward’) studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed hardening improved early emergence by as much as 20% against dry seed.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Hardeninge0
Outcome
early emergencee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
dry seed controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Hardening and moisturizing treatments improved early emergence by as much as 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to a dry seed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed moisturizing improved early emergence by as much as 20% against dry seed.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
moisturizinge0
Outcome
early emergencee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
dry seed controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Hardening and moisturizing treatments improved early emergence by as much as 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to a dry seed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmoconditioning significantly lowered field emergence compared with dry seed.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
osmoconditioninge0
Outcome
field emergencee0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
dry seed controle1

Verbatim

e0

“osmoconditioning significantly lowered field emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–683 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to a dry seed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisturizing improved emergence uniformity and reduced time to 50% or 75% emergence.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Seed moisturizinge0
Outcome
uniformity of emergencee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
dry seed controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Seed moisturizing and hardening also improved uniformity of emergence, and reduced the number of days required to attain 50% or 75% emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to a dry seed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hardening improved emergence uniformity and reduced time to 50% or 75% emergence.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
hardeninge0
Outcome
uniformity of emergencee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
dry seed controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Seed moisturizing and hardening also improved uniformity of emergence, and reduced the number of days required to attain 50% or 75% emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to a dry seed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–49 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.