Paper · 2010

Effect of interaction between internal ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on ripening and cell wall components metabolism of tomato fruit

Zhengke Zhang; Donald J. Huber; J. H. Lee; et al.

14
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】This study was to explore the effect of interaction between internal ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on ripening physiology of tomato fruit during postharvest storage.【Method】Breaker(cv.Florida 47)tomato fruits as a model system were divided into 4 groups,2 groups of fruit were maintained under hypoxic hypobaric(HH,8kPa,1.7kPa O2)conditions for 6h,followed immediately by treatment with sub-saturating levels(50μg/L)of aqueous 1-MCP and di-water for 1min at 20℃,respectively.Another 2groups of fruits without prior to exposure to HH were treated 50μg/L 1-MCP and di-water for 1min at 20℃,respectively.After treatment,all fruits were stored at 20℃and the ripening related physiological indexes as well as changes in cell wall metabolism components were investigated during storage.【Result】Upon removal from HH conditions,ethylene synthesis and internal ethylene concentration(IEC) were reduced 75.6%in breaker tomato fruits.Compared to control fruit and fruit receiving 50μg/L aqueous 1-MCP without prior exposure to HH conditions,fruits subjected to HH conditions showed significantly enhanced 1-MCP efficacy on suppressing softening,in which the firmness in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was 29.8% and 15.6% higher that that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruit during 4-16d of storage;The respiration and ethylene peak in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was delayed by 4and 2d,respectively,compared with that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruits,but no significant difference was found in climacteric maxima of respiration and ethylene production;The treatment with 1-MCP after HH also more evidently affected the activity trends of cell wall enzymes including polygalacturonase(PG),pectinmethylesterase(PME),α-galactosidase(α-Gal)andβ-galactosidase(β-Gal)activity,typically on PG activity.Consistent with the trend of PG activity,water/CDTA-soluble uronic acid(UA)content was strongly suppressed by treatment of 50μg/L 1-MCP following HH,in which water-soluble and CDTA-soluble content UA in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH were 37.3% and 31.4%lower than that in control,21.9% and 20.5% lower than that in 1-MCP-treated fruits during 6-12d of storage,respectively;Polyuronides in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH exhibited slower molecular mass downshifts compared with the control and 1-MCP-treated fruits.In addition,all results in this study showed that there were no significant differences between control and HH treatment.【Conclusion】The results of this study offer further evidence that internal ethylene levels play a significant role in 1-MCP responsiveness and may explain the variable sensitivity of different climacteric fruits and cultivars to 1-MCP applied at and beyond the initiation of ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypoxic hypobaric exposure reduced ethylene synthesis and internal ethylene concentration in breaker tomato fruit by 75.6%.

Organ / stage
breaker tomato fruitse0
Treatment
hypoxic hypobaric(HH,8kPa,1.7kPa O2)conditions for 6he1
Outcome
ethylene synthesis and internal ethylene concentration(IEC)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon removal from HH conditions,ethylene synthesis and internal ethylene concentration(IEC) were reduced 75.6%in breaker tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“hypoxic hypobaric(HH,8kPa,1.7kPa O2)conditions for 6h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After HH and 1-MCP treatment, tomato fruit firmness was 29.8% higher than controls during 4-16 days of storage.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
29.8%e0
Qualifier
during 4-16d of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“fruits subjected to HH conditions showed significantly enhanced 1-MCP efficacy on suppressing softening,in which the firmness in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was 29.8% and 15.6% higher that that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruit during 4-16d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After HH and 1-MCP treatment, tomato fruit firmness was 15.6% higher than in fruit treated with 1-MCP alone during 4-16 days of storage.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.6%e0
Qualifier
during 4-16d of storagee0
Comparator
1-MCP-treated fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“the firmness in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was 29.8% and 15.6% higher that that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruit during 4-16d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP delayed the respiration peak by four days relative to control and 1-MCP-only fruit.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
delayede0
Value
4e0
Comparator
control and 1-MCP-treated fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“The respiration and ethylene peak in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was delayed by 4and 2d,respectively,compared with that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP delayed the ethylene peak by two days relative to control and 1-MCP-only fruit.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
ethylene peake0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2de0
Comparator
control and 1-MCP-treated fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“The respiration and ethylene peak in fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was delayed by 4and 2d,respectively,compared with that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Climacteric maxima of respiration and ethylene production did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
fruite1
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe1
Outcome
climacteric maxima of respiration and ethylene productione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
control and 1-MCP-treated fruitse1

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference was found in climacteric maxima of respiration and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit treated with 1-MCP following HH was delayed by 4and 2d,respectively,compared with that in control and 1-MCP-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP changed the activity trends of four cell wall enzymes, particularly PG.

Treatment
1-MCP after HHe0
Gene
polygalacturonase(PG)e0
Outcome
activity trends of cell wall enzymese0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with 1-MCP after HH also more evidently affected the activity trends of cell wall enzymes including polygalacturonase(PG),pectinmethylesterase(PME),α-galactosidase(α-Gal)andβ-galactosidase(β-Gal)activity,typically on PG activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1817 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP suppressed water-soluble uronic acid content by 37.3% relative to control during days 6-12.

Taxon
fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
water-solublee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
37.3%e0
Qualifier
during 6-12d of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“water-soluble and CDTA-soluble content UA in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH were 37.3% and 31.4%lower than that in control,21.9% and 20.5% lower than that in 1-MCP-treated fruits during 6-12d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP suppressed CDTA-soluble uronic acid content by 31.4% relative to control during days 6-12.

Taxon
fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
CDTA-soluble content UAe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
31.4%e0
Qualifier
during 6-12d of storagee0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“water-soluble and CDTA-soluble content UA in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH were 37.3% and 31.4%lower than that in control,21.9% and 20.5% lower than that in 1-MCP-treated fruits during 6-12d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP lowered water-soluble uronic acid content by 21.9% relative to 1-MCP alone during days 6-12.

Taxon
fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
water-solublee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
21.9%e0
Qualifier
during 6-12d of storagee0
Comparator
1-MCP-treated fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“water-soluble and CDTA-soluble content UA in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH were 37.3% and 31.4%lower than that in control,21.9% and 20.5% lower than that in 1-MCP-treated fruits during 6-12d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH followed by 1-MCP lowered CDTA-soluble uronic acid content by 20.5% relative to 1-MCP alone during days 6-12.

Taxon
fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
CDTA-soluble content UAe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.5%e0
Qualifier
during 6-12d of storagee0
Comparator
1-MCP-treated fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“water-soluble and CDTA-soluble content UA in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH were 37.3% and 31.4%lower than that in control,21.9% and 20.5% lower than that in 1-MCP-treated fruits during 6-12d of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyuronides in fruit given HH followed by 1-MCP showed slower molecular mass downshifts than in control and 1-MCP-only fruit.

Taxon
fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP following HHe0
Outcome
molecular mass downshiftse0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
the control and 1-MCP-treated fruitse0

Verbatim

e0

“Polyuronides in fruits treated with 1-MCP following HH exhibited slower molecular mass downshifts compared with the control and 1-MCP-treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2200–2348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HH treatment alone did not differ significantly from control in the measured tomato fruit results.

Treatment
HH treatmente0
Outcome
no significant differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences between control and HH treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2399–2469 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that internal ethylene levels affect responsiveness to 1-MCP.

Outcome
1-MCP responsivenesse0
Qualifier
internal ethylene levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“internal ethylene levels play a significant role in 1-MCP responsiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2536–2608 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–136 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.